Skip to main content
Ch. 16 - Regulation of Gene Expression in Bacteria

Chapter 16, Problem 10

Predict the effect on the inducibility of the lac operon of a mutation that disrupts the function of (a) the crp gene, which encodes the CAP protein, and (b) the CAP-binding site within the promoter.

Verified Solution
Video duration:
2m
This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
524
views
Was this helpful?

Video transcript

Hi everyone. Let's take a look at this practice problem together. What is the effect of the inhibition of a dental cyclist activity on the transcription of lack opteron. The lack opteron recall is a set of genes for lactose metabolism of bacteria. So we're looking for how inhibition of a dental cyclists will affect the transcription of it. Will it promote the transcription? Will it slow down the transcription process? Will it prevent the transcription process or will it trigger the overproduction recall that a dental cyclist is an enzyme whenever you see the suffix in biology. A. S. E. That usually means you have an enzyme and the dental cyclists, it was responsible for taking a teepee and converting that into C. A. M. P. Which stands for cyclic adenosine, mono phosphate. So how do a dental cyclists cmp And the lack opteron all work together. Let's take a look at the lack opteron in the lack opteron we've got genes Z. Y. And a an operator a promoter. And this cap site C. A. P. Or CAP stands for catapult light activating protein. Now this is a binding site for cap which is here in purple and that binds to it and helps promote RNA preliminaries to bind to the promoter and thus helps promote transcription. However, cap can only bind here if C A. M. P. Is attached to it. So if a dental cyclist is inhibited it's not going to be making the molecule C. A. M. P. So this won't be able to attach to the cap protein. So you won't have binding of the C. A. P. C. a M. P complex to the cap site. Therefore RNA polymerase won't be able to bind and start transcription. So there will be no transcription occurring. So it's not a promoting transcription process. It's not be slowing down the transcription process and it's not d triggering the overproduction of the LAC operate on. The answer is c. It is preventing the transcription process. Alright, everyone. I hope you found this helpful and I'll see you soon for the next practice problem.
Related Practice
Textbook Question
The locations of numerous lacI⁻ and lacIˢ mutations have been determined within the DNA sequence of the lacI gene. Among these, lacI⁻ mutations were found to occur in the 5′-upstream region of the gene, while lacIˢ mutations were found to occur farther downstream in the gene. Are the locations of the two types of mutations within the gene consistent with what is known about the function of the repressor that is the product of the lacI gene?
372
views
Textbook Question
Describe the experimental rationale that allowed the lac repressor to be isolated.
380
views
Textbook Question
What properties demonstrate that the lac repressor is a protein? Describe the evidence that it indeed serves as a repressor within the operon system.
445
views
Textbook Question
Erythritol, a natural sugar abundant in fruits and fermenting foods, is about 65 percent as sweet as table sugar and has about 95 percent fewer calories. It is 'tooth friendly' and generally devoid of negative side effects as a human consumable product. Pathogenic Brucella strains that catabolize erythritol contain four closely spaced genes, all involved in erythritol metabolism. One of the four genes (eryD) encodes a product that represses the expression of the other three genes. Erythritol catabolism is stimulated by erythritol. Present a simple regulatory model to account for the regulation of erythritol catabolism in Brucella. Does this system appear to be under inducible or repressible control?
303
views
Textbook Question
Describe the role of attenuation in the regulation of tryptophan biosynthesis.
465
views
Textbook Question
Attenuation of the trp operon was viewed as a relatively inefficient way to achieve genetic regulation when it was first discovered in the 1970s. Since then, however, attenuation has been found to be a relatively common regulatory strategy. Assuming that attenuation is a relatively inefficient way to achieve genetic regulation, what might explain its widespread occurrence?
378
views