In this video, we're going to begin our discussion on monosaccharide configurations. And so, of course, in your previous organic chemistry courses, you guys learned how to determine the configurations of chiral carbons. And so you may already remember from your previous courses that configurations of monosaccharide chiral carbons can be designated using two different systems. The first system is the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system, which uses the letter R and the letter S to designate the configuration. And the second system is Fischer's convention, which uses the letter D and the letter L to designate configuration. And so moving forward in our course, we're going to talk about each of these two systems in separate videos, starting with the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system. So I'll see you guys in our next video.
- 1. Introduction to Biochemistry4h 34m
- What is Biochemistry?5m
- Characteristics of Life12m
- Abiogenesis13m
- Nucleic Acids16m
- Proteins12m
- Carbohydrates8m
- Lipids10m
- Taxonomy10m
- Cell Organelles12m
- Endosymbiotic Theory11m
- Central Dogma22m
- Functional Groups15m
- Chemical Bonds13m
- Organic Chemistry31m
- Entropy17m
- Second Law of Thermodynamics11m
- Equilibrium Constant10m
- Gibbs Free Energy37m
- 2. Water3h 23m
- 3. Amino Acids8h 10m
- Amino Acid Groups8m
- Amino Acid Three Letter Code13m
- Amino Acid One Letter Code37m
- Amino Acid Configuration20m
- Essential Amino Acids14m
- Nonpolar Amino Acids21m
- Aromatic Amino Acids14m
- Polar Amino Acids16m
- Charged Amino Acids40m
- How to Memorize Amino Acids1h 7m
- Zwitterion33m
- Non-Ionizable Vs. Ionizable R-Groups11m
- Isoelectric Point10m
- Isoelectric Point of Amino Acids with Ionizable R-Groups51m
- Titrations of Amino Acids with Non-Ionizable R-Groups44m
- Titrations of Amino Acids with Ionizable R-Groups38m
- Amino Acids and Henderson-Hasselbalch44m
- 4. Protein Structure10h 4m
- Peptide Bond18m
- Primary Structure of Protein31m
- Altering Primary Protein Structure15m
- Drawing a Peptide44m
- Determining Net Charge of a Peptide42m
- Isoelectric Point of a Peptide37m
- Approximating Protein Mass7m
- Peptide Group22m
- Ramachandran Plot26m
- Atypical Ramachandran Plots12m
- Alpha Helix15m
- Alpha Helix Pitch and Rise20m
- Alpha Helix Hydrogen Bonding24m
- Alpha Helix Disruption23m
- Beta Strand12m
- Beta Sheet12m
- Antiparallel and Parallel Beta Sheets39m
- Beta Turns26m
- Tertiary Structure of Protein16m
- Protein Motifs and Domains23m
- Denaturation14m
- Anfinsen Experiment20m
- Protein Folding34m
- Chaperone Proteins19m
- Prions4m
- Quaternary Structure15m
- Simple Vs. Conjugated Proteins10m
- Fibrous and Globular Proteins11m
- 5. Protein Techniques14h 5m
- Protein Purification7m
- Protein Extraction5m
- Differential Centrifugation15m
- Salting Out18m
- Dialysis9m
- Column Chromatography11m
- Ion-Exchange Chromatography35m
- Anion-Exchange Chromatography38m
- Size Exclusion Chromatography28m
- Affinity Chromatography16m
- Specific Activity16m
- HPLC29m
- Spectrophotometry51m
- Native Gel Electrophoresis23m
- SDS-PAGE34m
- SDS-PAGE Strategies16m
- Isoelectric Focusing17m
- 2D-Electrophoresis23m
- Diagonal Electrophoresis29m
- Mass Spectrometry12m
- Mass Spectrum47m
- Tandem Mass Spectrometry16m
- Peptide Mass Fingerprinting16m
- Overview of Direct Protein Sequencing30m
- Amino Acid Hydrolysis10m
- FDNB26m
- Chemical Cleavage of Bonds29m
- Peptidases1h 6m
- Edman Degradation30m
- Edman Degradation Sequenator and Sequencing Data Analysis4m
- Edman Degradation Reaction Efficiency20m
- Ordering Cleaved Fragments21m
- Strategy for Ordering Cleaved Fragments58m
- Indirect Protein Sequencing Via Geneomic Analyses24m
- 6. Enzymes and Enzyme Kinetics13h 38m
- Enzymes24m
- Enzyme-Substrate Complex17m
- Lock and Key Vs. Induced Fit Models23m
- Optimal Enzyme Conditions9m
- Activation Energy24m
- Types of Enzymes41m
- Cofactor15m
- Catalysis19m
- Electrostatic and Metal Ion Catalysis11m
- Covalent Catalysis18m
- Reaction Rate10m
- Enzyme Kinetics24m
- Rate Constants and Rate Law35m
- Reaction Orders52m
- Rate Constant Units11m
- Initial Velocity31m
- Vmax Enzyme27m
- Km Enzyme42m
- Steady-State Conditions25m
- Michaelis-Menten Assumptions18m
- Michaelis-Menten Equation52m
- Lineweaver-Burk Plot43m
- Michaelis-Menten vs. Lineweaver-Burk Plots20m
- Shifting Lineweaver-Burk Plots37m
- Calculating Vmax40m
- Calculating Km31m
- Kcat46m
- Specificity Constant1h 1m
- 7. Enzyme Inhibition and Regulation 8h 42m
- Enzyme Inhibition13m
- Irreversible Inhibition12m
- Reversible Inhibition9m
- Inhibition Constant26m
- Degree of Inhibition15m
- Apparent Km and Vmax29m
- Inhibition Effects on Reaction Rate10m
- Competitive Inhibition52m
- Uncompetitive Inhibition33m
- Mixed Inhibition40m
- Noncompetitive Inhibition26m
- Recap of Reversible Inhibition37m
- Allosteric Regulation7m
- Allosteric Kinetics17m
- Allosteric Enzyme Conformations33m
- Allosteric Effectors18m
- Concerted (MWC) Model25m
- Sequential (KNF) Model20m
- Negative Feedback13m
- Positive Feedback15m
- Post Translational Modification14m
- Ubiquitination19m
- Phosphorylation16m
- Zymogens13m
- 8. Protein Function 9h 41m
- Introduction to Protein-Ligand Interactions15m
- Protein-Ligand Equilibrium Constants22m
- Protein-Ligand Fractional Saturation32m
- Myoglobin vs. Hemoglobin27m
- Heme Prosthetic Group31m
- Hemoglobin Cooperativity23m
- Hill Equation21m
- Hill Plot42m
- Hemoglobin Binding in Tissues & Lungs31m
- Hemoglobin Carbonation & Protonation19m
- Bohr Effect23m
- BPG Regulation of Hemoglobin24m
- Fetal Hemoglobin6m
- Sickle Cell Anemia24m
- Chymotrypsin18m
- Chymotrypsin's Catalytic Mechanism38m
- Glycogen Phosphorylase21m
- Liver vs Muscle Glycogen Phosphorylase21m
- Antibody35m
- ELISA15m
- Motor Proteins14m
- Skeletal Muscle Anatomy22m
- Skeletal Muscle Contraction45m
- 9. Carbohydrates7h 49m
- Carbohydrates19m
- Monosaccharides15m
- Stereochemistry of Monosaccharides33m
- Monosaccharide Configurations32m
- Cyclic Monosaccharides20m
- Hemiacetal vs. Hemiketal19m
- Anomer14m
- Mutarotation13m
- Pyranose Conformations23m
- Common Monosaccharides33m
- Derivatives of Monosaccharides21m
- Reducing Sugars21m
- Reducing Sugars Tests19m
- Glycosidic Bond48m
- Disaccharides40m
- Glycoconjugates12m
- Polysaccharide7m
- Cellulose7m
- Chitin8m
- Peptidoglycan12m
- Starch13m
- Glycogen14m
- Lectins16m
- 10. Lipids5h 49m
- Lipids15m
- Fatty Acids30m
- Fatty Acid Nomenclature11m
- Omega-3 Fatty Acids12m
- Triacylglycerols11m
- Glycerophospholipids24m
- Sphingolipids13m
- Sphingophospholipids8m
- Sphingoglycolipids12m
- Sphingolipid Recap22m
- Waxes5m
- Eicosanoids19m
- Isoprenoids9m
- Steroids14m
- Steroid Hormones11m
- Lipid Vitamins19m
- Comprehensive Final Lipid Map13m
- Biological Membranes16m
- Physical Properties of Biological Membranes18m
- Types of Membrane Proteins8m
- Integral Membrane Proteins16m
- Peripheral Membrane Proteins12m
- Lipid-Linked Membrane Proteins21m
- 11. Biological Membranes and Transport 6h 37m
- Biological Membrane Transport21m
- Passive vs. Active Transport18m
- Passive Membrane Transport21m
- Facilitated Diffusion8m
- Erythrocyte Facilitated Transporter Models30m
- Membrane Transport of Ions29m
- Primary Active Membrane Transport15m
- Sodium-Potassium Ion Pump20m
- SERCA: Calcium Ion Pump10m
- ABC Transporters12m
- Secondary Active Membrane Transport12m
- Glucose Active Symporter Model19m
- Endocytosis & Exocytosis18m
- Neurotransmitter Release23m
- Summary of Membrane Transport21m
- Thermodynamics of Membrane Diffusion: Uncharged Molecule51m
- Thermodynamics of Membrane Diffusion: Charged Ion1h 1m
- 12. Biosignaling9h 45m
- Introduction to Biosignaling44m
- G protein-Coupled Receptors32m
- Stimulatory Adenylate Cyclase GPCR Signaling42m
- cAMP & PKA28m
- Inhibitory Adenylate Cyclase GPCR Signaling29m
- Drugs & Toxins Affecting GPCR Signaling20m
- Recap of Adenylate Cyclase GPCR Signaling5m
- Phosphoinositide GPCR Signaling58m
- PSP Secondary Messengers & PKC27m
- Recap of Phosphoinositide Signaling7m
- Receptor Tyrosine Kinases26m
- Insulin28m
- Insulin Receptor23m
- Insulin Signaling on Glucose Metabolism57m
- Recap Of Insulin Signaling in Glucose Metabolism6m
- Insulin Signaling as a Growth Factor1h 1m
- Recap of Insulin Signaling As A Growth Factor9m
- Recap of Insulin Signaling1m
- Jak-Stat Signaling25m
- Lipid Hormone Signaling15m
- Summary of Biosignaling13m
- Signaling Defects & Cancer20m
- Review 1: Nucleic Acids, Lipids, & Membranes2h 47m
- Nucleic Acids 19m
- Nucleic Acids 211m
- Nucleic Acids 34m
- Nucleic Acids 44m
- DNA Sequencing 19m
- DNA Sequencing 211m
- Lipids 111m
- Lipids 24m
- Membrane Structure 110m
- Membrane Structure 29m
- Membrane Transport 18m
- Membrane Transport 24m
- Membrane Transport 36m
- Practice - Nucleic Acids 111m
- Practice - Nucleic Acids 23m
- Practice - Nucleic Acids 39m
- Lipids11m
- Practice - Membrane Structure 17m
- Practice - Membrane Structure 25m
- Practice - Membrane Transport 16m
- Practice - Membrane Transport 26m
- Review 2: Biosignaling, Glycolysis, Gluconeogenesis, & PP-Pathway3h 12m
- Biosignaling 19m
- Biosignaling 219m
- Biosignaling 311m
- Biosignaling 49m
- Glycolysis 17m
- Glycolysis 27m
- Glycolysis 38m
- Glycolysis 410m
- Fermentation6m
- Gluconeogenesis 18m
- Gluconeogenesis 27m
- Pentose Phosphate Pathway15m
- Practice - Biosignaling13m
- Practice - Bioenergetics 110m
- Practice - Bioenergetics 216m
- Practice - Glycolysis 111m
- Practice - Glycolysis 27m
- Practice - Gluconeogenesis5m
- Practice - Pentose Phosphate Path6m
- Review 3: Pyruvate & Fatty Acid Oxidation, Citric Acid Cycle, & Glycogen Metabolism2h 26m
- Pyruvate Oxidation9m
- Citric Acid Cycle 114m
- Citric Acid Cycle 27m
- Citric Acid Cycle 37m
- Citric Acid Cycle 411m
- Metabolic Regulation 18m
- Metabolic Regulation 213m
- Glycogen Metabolism 16m
- Glycogen Metabolism 28m
- Fatty Acid Oxidation 111m
- Fatty Acid Oxidation 28m
- Citric Acid Cycle Practice 17m
- Citric Acid Cycle Practice 26m
- Citric Acid Cycle Practice 32m
- Glucose and Glycogen Regulation Practice 14m
- Glucose and Glycogen Regulation Practice 26m
- Fatty Acid Oxidation Practice 14m
- Fatty Acid Oxidation Practice 27m
- Review 4: Amino Acid Oxidation, Oxidative Phosphorylation, & Photophosphorylation1h 48m
- Amino Acid Oxidation 15m
- Amino Acid Oxidation 211m
- Oxidative Phosphorylation 18m
- Oxidative Phosphorylation 210m
- Oxidative Phosphorylation 310m
- Oxidative Phosphorylation 47m
- Photophosphorylation 15m
- Photophosphorylation 29m
- Photophosphorylation 310m
- Practice: Amino Acid Oxidation 12m
- Practice: Amino Acid Oxidation 22m
- Practice: Oxidative Phosphorylation 15m
- Practice: Oxidative Phosphorylation 24m
- Practice: Oxidative Phosphorylation 35m
- Practice: Photophosphorylation 15m
- Practice: Photophosphorylation 21m
Monosaccharide Configurations - Online Tutor, Practice Problems & Exam Prep
Understanding monosaccharide configurations involves two primary systems: the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system for R/S designations and Fisher's convention for D/L configurations. The Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system assigns priorities to chiral carbons based on atomic numbers, while Fisher's convention relates configurations to the orientation of hydroxyl groups in glyceraldehyde. Typically, D configurations correspond to R configurations, and L configurations correspond to S configurations. The overall configuration of a monosaccharide is determined by the highest numbered chiral carbon, emphasizing the importance of these systems in carbohydrate chemistry.
Monosaccharide Configurations
Video transcript
Monosaccharide Configurations
Video transcript
So in this video, we're going to refresh your guys' memories of how to use the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system to designate absolute configurations to chiral carbons using the letters R and S. The Cahn-Ingold-Prelog System is really just a synonym for R-S configuration.
Let's take a look at our sugar down below, glyceraldehyde. The chiral carbon is this carbon atom right here in the middle. Notice that the carbon at the top is not chiral because it has a double bond, or 2 bonds leading to the same chemical group of an oxygen atom. And the carbon at the bottom is also not chiral because it has two bonds leading to the same chemical group of a hydrogen atom. The only reason that the chiral carbon in the center is chiral is because it has 4 distinct chemical groups attached to it.
When we're trying to determine the configuration of this chiral carbon using the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system and R-S configuration, these are the 3 steps that we really need to consider. The first is to assign priorities number 1 through 4 to each of the chemical groups that are attached to the chiral carbon. These assignments are based on the atomic numbers of the atoms in each chemical group. Looking at these 4 distinct pathways connected to this chiral carbon, we have a hydroxyl group, this entire group here, then this group down here, and, last but not least, this group to the left.
The oxygen atom has the highest atomic number and is assigned priority number 1. The carbon atoms in the blue and green groups have equal priority until you consider the substituents attached to those carbons. The carbon atom at the top has a double bond to an oxygen, whereas the carbon at the bottom only has one single bond to an oxygen, so the double bond has a higher priority. This pathway gets priority number 2, and the carbon atom down here gets priority number 3. That leaves the hydrogen atom with priority number 4.
In the second step, we determine if the configurations of priorities 1, 2, and 3 (ignoring 4), are arranged in a clockwise R configuration or a counterclockwise S configuration. After analyzing the priorities from 1 to 2, 2 to 3, and 3 back to 1, we see that it forms a counterclockwise pattern, which appears to be an S configuration.
The last and final step (step number 3) is only necessary if priority number 4 is on a wedge popping out of the page. Checking priority number 4, we see it's on a horizontal bond of the Fisher projection, which means it is indeed on a wedge. Therefore, even though this looks like an S configuration, because priority number 4 is on a wedge, this is actually an R configuration. So, this chiral carbon in the center is assigned an R configuration.
This video has outlined the steps we take to determine R-S configuration, which might be crucial as your professors could expect you to remember how to do this. Moving forward, we have some practice problems to help refresh your memories. Hopefully, this was a helpful refresher for you guys. In our next video, we'll talk about how to determine D-L configuration using Fisher's convention, so I'll see you guys there.
Monosaccharide Configurations
Video transcript
So now that we've refreshed our memories on how to designate RS configuration using the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system, in this video, we're going to talk about how to designate DL configurations using Fisher's convention, which is actually more commonly used on carbohydrates since Fisher's convention was developed using carbohydrates. And so, Fisher's convention again is going to designate either D or L configurations relative to Glyceraldehyde enantiomers. And so, glyceraldehyde is just the name of one of the smallest and simplest sugars that exist. And again, enantiomers are just referring to non-superimposable mirror images.
And so, if we take a look down below at the image here in this box, notice that we're showing you the 2 Glyceraldehyde enantiomers. And so what's important to know is that the D configuration is going to be assigned to a chiral carbon when the hydroxyl group of that chiral carbon is pointing to the right, and the L configuration will be assigned to a chiral carbon when the hydroxyl group of that chiral carbon is pointing to the left of the Fischer projection. And so you can think L is for left. And so if we take a look down below at our Glyceraldehyde enantiomers, notice that this enantiomer over here has its hydroxyl group on its chiral carbon pointing to the right of the Fischer projection. And of course, if the hydroxyl group is pointing to the right, then we must assign a D configuration. And so that means that this glyceraldehyde enantiomer here is the D-Glyceraldehyde form and has D configuration.
Now notice looking at this enantiomer over here, the mirror image, its hydroxyl group on its chiral carbon is pointing to the left of the Fischer projection. And of course, a hydroxyl group pointing to the left corresponds with L configuration. And so this glyceraldehyde enantiomer over here is indeed the L-Glyceraldehyde form and has L configuration.
Now, one thing that's important to note here is that Fisher's convention will only properly work with standard Fisher projections. And recall that way back in our previous lesson videos, we covered standard Fisher projections. And so recall that standard Fisher projections will always have the carbonyl group on the top of the Fischer projection or towards the top of the Fischer projection. And so notice that with these glyceraldehyde enantiomers, the carbonyl group is hidden within the aldehyde group here, and so the carbonyl group is indeed on the top. And also recall that with standard Fisher projections, the longest carbon chain must be vertical. And so when we take a look at these Glyceraldehyde enantiomer over here, notice that the longest carbon chain is indeed vertical in both of these. So these are standard Fischer projections that are being shown. And most of the time, you will be given Fisher projections that are already in standard Fisher projection form, so that makes your job a little bit easier.
Now, usually under most circumstances that you'll encounter in your biochemistry course, D configurations are going to equal R configurations, and usually, L configurations are going to equal S configurations. But this is not always going to be true under every single circumstance. Again, this is going to be usually true under most circumstances that we will encounter. But if you want to be 100% safe, then all you really need to do is determine RS configuration separately from DL configuration.
Alright. So now that we know how to determine DL configurations, let's go ahead and determine the DL configurations for all of the chiral carbons in these 2 glucose enantiomers shown over here. And so if we take a look at this first chiral carbon right here, notice that its hydroxyl group is pointing to the right. And of course, an OH group pointing to the right corresponds with D configuration. And so that means that we can give this chiral carbon right here a D configuration. So we'll put a little D right next to it. Now moving on to the next chiral carbon right here, notice that its hydroxyl group is pointing to the left. And of course, a left-pointing hydroxyl group corresponds with L configuration. So we can go ahead and give this chiral carbon right here an L configuration.
And then notice that these next two chiral carbons both have their hydroxyl groups pointing to the right, which again corresponds with D configuration. So we can go ahead and assign both of these chiral carbons D configuration. So now moving on to the next glucose enantiomer over here, notice that its first chiral carbon right here has its hydroxyl group pointing to the left, which of course corresponds with L configuration. So we can go ahead and give this chiral carbon an L configuration. Notice that the next chiral carbon right here has its hydroxyl group pointing to the right, so it's going to have a D configuration, so we can put D over here. And then the next 2 chiral carbons have both of their hydroxyl groups, or have their hydroxyl groups pointing to the left, which corresponds with L configuration. So we can put 2 Ls here.
And so the real question is, how do we determine the configuration of an entire monosaccharide if it contains a mixture of configurations, a mixture of D and L configurations. Well, really, that's what these next two bullet points are addressing right here. And so a monosaccharide will have the same exact configuration as the configuration of the highest numbered chiral carbon, or in other words, to say the same exact thing, we can say that a monosaccharide's configuration is going to be that of the chiral carbon that is furthest from its carbonyl group. And so if we take a look at this glucose enantiomer right here, notice that its carbonyl group is way up here at the top in this aldehyde group. And so the chiral carbon that is furthest away from the carbonyl group is going to be this chiral carbon right down here. And so that means that the configuration of this entire monosaccharide is going to be the same as this chiral carbon that's furthest away, which is a D configuration. And so that means that this entire glucose enantiomer is the D-glucose enantiomer.
Now if we take a look at this other enantiomer over here, notice that its carbonyl group, again, is at the very top, here in this aldehyde group. And the chiral carbon that's furthest from this carbonyl group is this one right here. And so this one has an L configuration, which means that this entire monosaccharide here will also have the L configuration, so this will be L-glucose. And so, really, this, you'll be able to get a good hang of, how this works as you start to get more practice. So moving forward in our course, we will definitely be able to apply these concepts in practice problems.
Now, the last thing that I want to leave you guys off with is that unlike biological amino acids, which we know from way back in our previous lesson videos are usually in the L configuration, biological carbohydrates on the other hand, they tend to usually be in the D configuration. And so, the real reason for why life prefers L amino acids but it prefers D carbohydrates is unknown. And so there are some theories, but we are not going to cover those theories here. But what you do need to know is that life prefers D carbohydrates and life prefers L amino acids. And of course, there are some exceptions, but for the most part, these are the preferences. And so this concludes our lesson on Fisher's projection and how to determine DL configuration. And again, we'll be able to get some practice as we move forward in our course. So I'll see you guys in our next video.
Identify the D/L and R/S configuration of all of the following monosaccharides:
Problem Transcript
How many D-stereoisomers are possible for a D-ketopentose?
Which TWO of the following traits apply to Fischer's Convention for naming stereoisomers?
a) Utilizes (+) and (-) designations.
b) Utilizes (D) and (L) designations.
c) Utilizes (R) and (S) designations.
d) Requires drawing the compound with aldehyde/ketone at the top.
e) Based on optical properties of the compound in solution.
f) Reflects stereochemistry at multiple centers.
Problem Transcript
How many possible epimers of D-glucose exist?
Here’s what students ask on this topic:
What is the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system for designating monosaccharide configurations?
The Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system, also known as the R/S system, is used to designate the absolute configurations of chiral carbons in monosaccharides. This system assigns priorities to the four substituents attached to the chiral carbon based on their atomic numbers. The steps include: 1) Assigning priorities from 1 to 4, 2) Determining the order of priorities 1, 2, and 3 (clockwise for R and counterclockwise for S), and 3) Checking if the lowest priority group (4) is on a wedge. If it is, the configuration is reversed. This system helps in understanding the spatial arrangement of atoms around the chiral center.
How do you determine D and L configurations using Fischer projections?
Fischer projections are used to determine D and L configurations of monosaccharides. In this system, the configuration is based on the orientation of the hydroxyl group (-OH) on the chiral carbon furthest from the carbonyl group. If the hydroxyl group is on the right, the molecule is in the D configuration; if it is on the left, it is in the L configuration. This method is particularly useful for carbohydrates, as it was developed using glyceraldehyde enantiomers. Fischer projections must be in standard form, with the carbonyl group at the top and the longest carbon chain vertical.
What is the relationship between D/L and R/S configurations in monosaccharides?
In monosaccharides, D configurations usually correspond to R configurations, and L configurations usually correspond to S configurations. However, this is not always the case under all circumstances. The D/L system is based on the orientation of the hydroxyl group in Fischer projections, while the R/S system is based on the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules. To be 100% accurate, it is recommended to determine R/S and D/L configurations separately.
Why are D configurations more common in biological carbohydrates?
Biological carbohydrates tend to be in the D configuration, while biological amino acids are usually in the L configuration. The exact reason for this preference is unknown, though there are several theories. This preference is significant in biochemistry because it affects how these molecules interact with enzymes and other biological molecules. Understanding this preference helps in studying metabolic pathways and the synthesis of biomolecules.
How do you assign priorities to substituents in the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system?
In the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog system, priorities are assigned to substituents based on their atomic numbers. The higher the atomic number, the higher the priority. If two substituents have the same atomic number, the next atoms in the substituents are compared. Double and triple bonds are treated as if the atoms were duplicated or triplicated. This method ensures a consistent way to determine the spatial arrangement of atoms around a chiral center.