So with our discussion of monoprotic buffers, diprotic buffers, we're now left with polyprotic buffers. Here, we're going to say polyprotic buffers usually is synonymous with a triprotic buffer where we have 3 acidic hydrogens. We're going to say here a triprotic buffer can be approached in a way similar to diprotic buffers. The key difference is that a triprotic acid has now 3 pKa values or 3 Ka values. Again, when we say polyprotic, we're usually referring to triprotic acids, but there are acids with more than 3 acidic hydrogens. Those are fewer, so we tend to just stick to 3 acidic hydrogens. Now we're going to say for polyprotic buffers, remember we have different forms that our polyprotic acid can take. We have the fully acidified version or its fully protonated version which is H3A. Here, it has all 3 of its acidic hydrogens. We can talk about removing the 1st acidic hydrogen. If we're talking about removing the 1st acidic hydrogen, that means we're talking about Ka1. Removing that first acidic hydrogen gives us our first intermediate form which is H2A-. Then we remove the 2nd acidic hydrogen giving us Ka2 involved. Now we get the 2nd intermediate form which is HA2-. Then finally, we're removing the last acidic hydrogen which will give us our basic form A33-. Remember in earlier videos where we talked about polyprotic acids in general, if we could talk about Ka going one way in removing acidic hydrogen, we could talk about Kb when adding back acidic hydrogens. Remember here, this would be Kb1, this would be Kb2, and this would be Kb3. If you don't quite remember that, make sure you go back and take a look at our polyprotic acid videos. We talk about the relationships between your acid dissociation constants and your base dissociation constants when looking at protic, diprotic, and polyprotic acids.
Now with these different forms of our polyprotic buffers, we have different forms of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. In this first one here, we're talking about the relationship between the acid form and the 1st intermediate form, then we know we're dealing with Ka1. And so the equation is pH equals pKa1 plus log of the intermediate one over the acid form. Remember, the bottom portion of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is the portion that contains more acidic H+ ions. And the top version, which represents the more basic form, has one less acidic H+ ion. Then if we're talking about our second form of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, we're talking about pKa2 which means we're talking about the relationship between our first intermediate and the second intermediate. We've removed the second acidic hydrogen, so that's Ka2 which is why we're dealing with pKa2. Here it would be plus log of intermediate 2 divided by intermediate 1. Again, the more acidic form, the one with more hydrogens goes on the bottom. The one that is more basic, the one that has less acidic H+ ions goes on top. Then finally, in this form, we're talking about intermediate 2 going to the basic form. So we're dealing with Ka3. Just as before, we put the more acidic form on the bottom and the more basic form on top.
Now here, we could take a common example, citric acid. Citric acid represents a triprotic acid, so it has 3 acidic hydrogens. In these three different scenarios, in this first one, we have 0.10 molar of citric acid. Then we have 0.15 molar of the 1st intermediate form. Here, it's lost one of its acidic hydrogens and it's been replaced by a sodium ion here. Since we're talking about the acid form and the 1st intermediate form, we're dealing with Ka1. Here, this would be pH equals pKa1 plus log of the conjugate base form which is 0.15 molar divided by 0.10 molar. That'd be negative log of 7.4 times 10-4 plus log of 1.5 which would give us 3.31 as our pH at the end. For the next form, here we're dealing with moles. Remember, in the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, we can plug in molarity or moles into these areas. In the first one, we had molarity for both, so we plugged in molarity. Now we have moles, so we'll plug in the moles now. Here, this would be pH equals negative log of 1.7 times 10-5 plus log of the more basic form goes on top, the one with less acidic hydrogens which would be this one on top. So 0.25 moles divided by the more acidic form, the one with more H+ ions on the bottom. Here, that would give me 4.94 at the end. Then finally, here we have volume of molarity. Remember in this last situation, moles equals liters times molarity. If you divide these mL's by 1,000, you'll get their liters. Then you just multiply by their molarities. Right? So you'd get 0.016 moles. And then we have 0.060 liters times 0.25 molar. And then give us 0.015 moles. So pH here equals negative log of Ka3 times 10-7 plus log of more basic moles on top divided by the more acidic moles on the bottom. At the end, that will give us 6.43. Just remember, when we're dealing with a polyprotic buffer, it is important that you know which forms we are dealing with in the question. This will dictate if you're going to use Ka1, Ka2, or Ka3 in terms of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. As we delve deeper and deeper into these different types of buffers, always keep this in mind.