Skip to main content
Ch.21 - Transition Elements and Coordination Chemistry
Chapter 21, Problem 21.106

For each of the following complexes, draw a crystal field energy-level diagram, assign the electrons to orbitals, and predict the number of unpaired electrons. 
(a) [CrF6]3-
(b) [V(H2O)6]3+
(c) [Fe(CN)6]3-

Verified Solution

Video duration:
0m:0s
This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Crystal Field Theory

Crystal Field Theory (CFT) explains how the arrangement of ligands around a central metal ion affects the energy levels of the d-orbitals. In an octahedral complex, for example, the d-orbitals split into two energy levels: the lower-energy t2g and the higher-energy eg orbitals. This splitting is crucial for determining the electronic configuration of the metal ion and predicting properties such as color and magnetism.
Recommended video:
Guided course
01:18
The study of ligand-metal interactions helped to form Ligand Field Theory which combines CFT with MO Theory.

Electron Configuration and Orbital Filling

The electron configuration of a transition metal ion is determined by the number of electrons it has after accounting for its oxidation state. Electrons fill the d-orbitals according to the Aufbau principle, Hund's rule, and the Pauli exclusion principle. Understanding how to assign electrons to the split d-orbitals in a crystal field diagram is essential for predicting the number of unpaired electrons, which influences the magnetic properties of the complex.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:15
Electron Orbital Diagrams

Ligand Field Strength and Crystal Field Splitting

The strength of the ligands surrounding a metal ion affects the degree of d-orbital splitting, known as crystal field splitting energy (Δ). Strong field ligands, like CN⁻, cause a larger splitting, leading to lower energy configurations and potentially fewer unpaired electrons. Conversely, weak field ligands, like F⁻, result in smaller splitting, which can lead to more unpaired electrons. This concept is vital for predicting the magnetic behavior of the complexes.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:40
Strong-Field Ligands result in a large Δ and Weak-Field Ligands result in a small Δ.