So imagine that you're given this question right here. This is an exam. How are the following 2 compounds related? Are they identical, constitutional isomers, or different compounds? Where do you even begin? Well, it turns out that this question is, I think, a little bit beyond your level. All of you guys are probably a little bit stumped by this question. You might think that you know the right answer, and you might be right, but most likely, you didn't get to that answer in a systematic way. So what I want to teach you guys is the systematic way to get these problems right every single time. All right. So we're going to come back up to that question. What I actually want to do is go through these steps right here, and these steps will guide you through constitutional isomer questions.
Notice that it uses Index of Hydrogen Deficiency (IHD). That's why I had to teach you the IHD first because this is the easiest way to tell the difference between different types of compounds. So, my first question that I have to ask myself makes sense. It's just, are all the atoms the same? Because remember, I told you that in order to be a constitutional isomer, all the atoms have to be exactly the same. So the way that we tell, a lot of students what they do is they start counting every single atom in the entire molecule and they compare it to the other one, and then obviously, they see if they're the same or not. But what I would recommend is don't count the hydrogens. Count only non-hydrogen atoms and then count the IHD in both compounds. The reason why is that IHD is actually just a measurement of hydrogens. Remember that IHD would tell you how many hydrogens are missing? And IHD happens to be much easier to calculate the number of hydrogens. You know why? Because if you have to calculate the number of hydrogens, that means you're looking at a bond line structure. You're going to have to first put all the hydrogens in there, and then you might have so many hydrogens that you might miscount, and that happens all the time with students. So, what I prefer is instead of counting each hydrogen out at a time, just use the IHD instead. The IHD is a placeholder for the number of hydrogens. Now, check this out. If those two numbers are not exactly the same, so if I have a different amount of non-hydrogen atoms or a different amount of IHD in both of the atoms, in both of the molecules, then these are going to be different compounds. Why are they different compounds? Well, because if they don't have the same atoms, then they're just automatically different. A compound can only be the same as another compound if it has the same exact atoms inside of it. So that would be the answer for this question up here if we found that they had different amounts of carbons, which is a non-hydrogen atom, or different amounts of IHD. But let's keep going and see what happens. If they happen to line up, meaning that the non-hydrogen atoms and the IHD are exactly the same in both, then we go to step 2.
What is step 2? Well, step 2 makes sense as well. Now, I'm going to ask myself, are all the atoms connected exactly the same way? Now, it turns out that most of the time, this is going to be a very easy question to answer. Most of the time you're going to see your 2 compounds, and they're going to look very different. For example, one of them is a square and one of them is a 4-carbon chain. Would that be the same thing? Would it be the same thing if I had a square on one side and a 4-carbon chain on the other side? Would you say that they're connected the same way? Absolutely not. They look completely different. The only way that they can be connected the same is if every atom is connected to the same atom on the other molecule. So most of the time, common sense is just going to tell me yes or no. Either they look the same or they don't. But sometimes, you get a situation like up here where these two molecules above me, they look like they are kind of similar, but maybe they're rotated. I don't know. So, for this one, we're going to want to use a systematic method. What I always say is to look for what I call a landmark atom. Now, this is not a word that you're going to find in your book, so don't look for "landmark atom." It isn't anything. It's just a word that I use to say look for something that stands out. So, you would look for something that stands out, everything that you can compare in both molecules. So, for example, maybe if your compound has an oxygen in it, then you would look at where the oxygen is in the first one and where the oxygen is in the second one and see, are they in the same place. If your compound has something else like a ring in it, maybe you look at the ring and you say, is the ring in the same place in both? If they are not exactly the same, then that means that you have constitutional isomers. Why? Because that means that we got to step 2, which means all the atoms and the IHD were the same. But then, step 2, what we said is that they are not exactly the same in the way they're connected. So that's constitutional isomers. That's the definition of an isomer. What if they are the same, though? So, let's say that means that now all my atoms are the same and they're connected exactly the same. Then those are just going to be identical compounds. Does that make sense? And those are my 3 options.