Table of contents
- 1. Introduction to Biology2h 40m
- 2. Chemistry3h 40m
- 3. Water1h 26m
- 4. Biomolecules2h 23m
- 5. Cell Components2h 26m
- 6. The Membrane2h 31m
- 7. Energy and Metabolism2h 0m
- 8. Respiration2h 40m
- 9. Photosynthesis2h 49m
- 10. Cell Signaling59m
- 11. Cell Division2h 47m
- 12. Meiosis2h 0m
- 13. Mendelian Genetics4h 41m
- Introduction to Mendel's Experiments7m
- Genotype vs. Phenotype17m
- Punnett Squares13m
- Mendel's Experiments26m
- Mendel's Laws18m
- Monohybrid Crosses16m
- Test Crosses14m
- Dihybrid Crosses20m
- Punnett Square Probability26m
- Incomplete Dominance vs. Codominance20m
- Epistasis7m
- Non-Mendelian Genetics12m
- Pedigrees6m
- Autosomal Inheritance21m
- Sex-Linked Inheritance43m
- X-Inactivation9m
- 14. DNA Synthesis2h 27m
- 15. Gene Expression3h 20m
- 16. Regulation of Expression3h 31m
- Introduction to Regulation of Gene Expression13m
- Prokaryotic Gene Regulation via Operons27m
- The Lac Operon21m
- Glucose's Impact on Lac Operon25m
- The Trp Operon20m
- Review of the Lac Operon & Trp Operon11m
- Introduction to Eukaryotic Gene Regulation9m
- Eukaryotic Chromatin Modifications16m
- Eukaryotic Transcriptional Control22m
- Eukaryotic Post-Transcriptional Regulation28m
- Eukaryotic Post-Translational Regulation13m
- 17. Viruses37m
- 18. Biotechnology2h 58m
- 19. Genomics17m
- 20. Development1h 5m
- 21. Evolution3h 1m
- 22. Evolution of Populations3h 52m
- 23. Speciation1h 37m
- 24. History of Life on Earth2h 6m
- 25. Phylogeny2h 31m
- 26. Prokaryotes4h 59m
- 27. Protists1h 12m
- 28. Plants1h 22m
- 29. Fungi36m
- 30. Overview of Animals34m
- 31. Invertebrates1h 2m
- 32. Vertebrates50m
- 33. Plant Anatomy1h 3m
- 34. Vascular Plant Transport2m
- 35. Soil37m
- 36. Plant Reproduction47m
- 37. Plant Sensation and Response1h 9m
- 38. Animal Form and Function1h 19m
- 39. Digestive System10m
- 40. Circulatory System1h 57m
- 41. Immune System1h 12m
- 42. Osmoregulation and Excretion50m
- 43. Endocrine System4m
- 44. Animal Reproduction2m
- 45. Nervous System55m
- 46. Sensory Systems46m
- 47. Muscle Systems23m
- 48. Ecology3h 11m
- Introduction to Ecology20m
- Biogeography14m
- Earth's Climate Patterns50m
- Introduction to Terrestrial Biomes10m
- Terrestrial Biomes: Near Equator13m
- Terrestrial Biomes: Temperate Regions10m
- Terrestrial Biomes: Northern Regions15m
- Introduction to Aquatic Biomes27m
- Freshwater Aquatic Biomes14m
- Marine Aquatic Biomes13m
- 49. Animal Behavior28m
- 50. Population Ecology3h 41m
- Introduction to Population Ecology28m
- Population Sampling Methods23m
- Life History12m
- Population Demography17m
- Factors Limiting Population Growth14m
- Introduction to Population Growth Models22m
- Linear Population Growth6m
- Exponential Population Growth29m
- Logistic Population Growth32m
- r/K Selection10m
- The Human Population22m
- 51. Community Ecology2h 46m
- Introduction to Community Ecology2m
- Introduction to Community Interactions9m
- Community Interactions: Competition (-/-)38m
- Community Interactions: Exploitation (+/-)23m
- Community Interactions: Mutualism (+/+) & Commensalism (+/0)9m
- Community Structure35m
- Community Dynamics26m
- Geographic Impact on Communities21m
- 52. Ecosystems2h 36m
- 53. Conservation Biology24m
53. Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology
3:16 minutes
Problem 21
Textbook Question
Textbook QuestionSCIENTIFIC THINKING In 1954, workers at Michigan State University began spraying the elm trees on campus annually with DDT to kill disease-carrying bark beetles. In the spring of 1955, large numbers of dead robins were found on the campus. Observers thought perhaps the robins died after eating earthworms contaminated by DDT the previous spring. Suggest how scientists could have investigated the scientific validity of this idea.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Identify the hypothesis: The hypothesis in this scenario is that the robins died due to consuming earthworms that were contaminated with DDT.
Design an experiment: Set up a controlled experiment where two groups of robins are observed. One group is fed earthworms from areas where DDT was sprayed, and the other group is fed earthworms from areas without DDT exposure.
Collect data: Monitor the health and mortality rates of the robins in both groups over a suitable period of time to gather sufficient data on the effects of DDT-contaminated earthworms.
Analyze the data: Compare the health outcomes of the two groups using statistical methods to determine if there is a significant difference in mortality rates and health issues between the robins fed with DDT-contaminated earthworms and those that were not.
Draw conclusions: Based on the analysis, determine whether the initial hypothesis that DDT-contaminated earthworms caused the death of the robins is supported by the experimental data.
Recommended similar problem, with video answer:
Verified Solution
This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above
Video duration:
3mPlay a video:
Was this helpful?
Key Concepts
Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of scientific inquiry where researchers formulate a testable statement based on observations. In this case, scientists could propose a hypothesis that the robins died due to DDT-contaminated earthworms. They would then design experiments to collect data that either supports or refutes this hypothesis, allowing for a systematic investigation of the cause of the robins' deaths.
Recommended video:
Guided course
03:02
Test Crosses
Ecological Impact of Pesticides
Understanding the ecological impact of pesticides like DDT is crucial for assessing their effects on wildlife. DDT is known to bioaccumulate in the food chain, meaning that organisms at higher trophic levels, such as robins, can suffer from toxic effects after consuming contaminated prey. This concept helps scientists evaluate the potential pathways through which DDT could harm bird populations.
Recommended video:
Guided course
03:35
Geographic Impact on Communities
Experimental Design
Experimental design refers to the planning of an experiment to ensure that it effectively tests a hypothesis. Scientists could design a study that includes control and experimental groups, where one group of robins is exposed to DDT and another is not. By comparing the health and mortality rates of both groups, researchers can draw conclusions about the relationship between DDT exposure and robin mortality.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:50
Experimental Design Example 1
Watch next
Master Conservation Biology and Biodiversity with a bite sized video explanation from Jason Amores Sumpter
Start learningRelated Videos
Related Practice