Brief Guide to Writing Academic Arguments, A, 1st edition
Published by Pearson (December 17, 2008) © 2009
- Stephen Wilhoit The University of Dayton
- Hardcover, paperback or looseleaf edition
- Affordable rental option for select titles
- Free shipping on looseleafs and traditional textbooks
A Brief Guide to Writing Academic Arguments prepares students to read and write the types of argument-related source-based writing they are most likely to encounter in college.
A Brief Guide offers an introduction to argumentation, critical reading, and argument-related source-based writing. The instruction is firmly based in both writing process and rhetorical theory, offering step-by-step advice on producing effective, persuasive, conventionally sound arguments for academic audiences and purposes.
A Brief Guide offers a complete argument course with an introductory chapter on Classical Argument, a highly-praised simplified approach to Toulmin, and four chapters on claim types rounded out with chapters on rhetorical analysis and visual argument. Professional and student essays drawn from disciplines across the curriculum help students understand the nature of academic arguments; how to analyze and evaluate arguments; how academic writers form, support, and explain claims; and how they use source material as evidence.
- A Brief Guide combines the best of several composition theories–expressive, cognitive, social, and rhetorical. Expressivist pedagogies help students explore the generative nature of writing and the importance of establishing and maintaining their voices in academic writing. Cognitive pedagogies teach writing as a problem-solving and problem-posing activity that can be analyzed and understood. Social pedagogies encourage students to see how writers always write in a social context, and rhetorical pedagogies help students read and write persuasive texts that meet the unique demands of different contexts, audiences, and purposes.
- The highly-praised modified approach to Toulmin discusses the need for writers to explain how grounds support a claim instead of presenting warrants strictly as underlying assumptions that link grounds to a claim.
- Twenty professional and student essays and one sample annotated bibliography draw from disciplines across the curriculum help students understand the nature of academic arguments, how to analyze and evaluate arguments, how academic writers form, support, and explain claims, and how they use source material as evidence.
- Extensive sets of questions accompany the readings: Before You Read questions ask students to reflect on the readings’ topic and form predictions; As You Read questions guide students through the texts; and After You Finish Reading questions encourage students to analyze and critique and establishing for themselves each reading’s value strength.
- Something to Write About questions offer brief writing-to-learn exercises at strategic points throughout each chapter in order to help students understand, critique, or apply the concept covered being offered at that point in the text.
- Something to Think About and Something to Talk About questions present a wide variety of critical thinking and reflection exercises throughout each chapter in order to help students evaluate their own reading, writing, and thinking processes; to help them better understand the conventions of academic argumentation; and to help them apply the material covered in the text to their own lives, interests, and education.
- Topic Heuristics present students with sample questions that show them how they might start with a broad topic and narrow it into a manageable line of inquiry for a paper (Chs 13-16).
- Invention Grids present students with sample graphics they might use to ask questions about their topic, purpose, and audience in order to brainstorm ideas and ways of using evidence to organize their papers (Chs 13-16).
- Box Outlines demonstrate in a visual way how writers might sequence their arguments from the introduction through the conclusion, creating coherence and persuasiveness through organization and carefully sequenced evidence (Chs 13-16).
Preface
Acknowledgments
Ch. 1 What Makes an Academic Argument “Academic”?
What “Argument” Means in an Academic Setting
Context Is Everything: Understanding the Rhetorical Situation of Academic Arguments
Elements of the Rhetorical Situation
How the Elements of the Rhetorical Situation Are Interconnected
Reading: “Generation Q,” by Thomas L. Friedman
Qualities of Effective Academic Arguments
Effective Academic Arguments Are Clear and Precise
Effective Academic Arguments Are Well Supported
Effective Academic Arguments Are Properly Qualified
Effective Academic Arguments Are Placed in Context
Effective Academic Arguments Employ an Appropriate Voice and Tone
Effective Academic Arguments Follow Established Conventions
Effective Academic Arguments Are Sensitive to Audience Needs
Ch. 2 The Elements of Persuasive Academic Arguments
What Makes Academic Arguments Persuasive?
Logos: The Role of Logic and Reason in Academic Arguments
Claims
Grounds
Explanations
Qualifications
Rebuttals
Logos in Action: A Sample Argument
Sample Reading: Letter to the Editor
Common Logos-related Fallacies
Pathos: The Role of Emotion in Academic Arguments
Pathos in Action: A Sample Essay
Reading: “Perils and Promise: Destroy an Embryo, Waste a Life,” by Christopher H. Smith
How Pathos Can Help You Develop Content and Choose Language
How Pathos Can Help You Create a Bond with Your Audience
How Pathos Can Help You Communicate Your Own Emotional Investment in Your Argument
Common Pathos-related Fallacies
Ethos: The Role of the Writer’s Authority and Credibility in Academic Arguments
Establishing Ethos through Your Knowledge of the Topic
Establishing Ethos through Accurate Writing
Establishing Ethos by Being Open Minded, Honest, and Fair
Establishing Ethos by Following Conventions
Ethos in Action: A Sample Rea
Need help? Get in touch