Thinking Rhetorically: A Guide to College Writing, 9th edition
Published by Pearson (May 19, 2022) © 2023
- John C. Bean Seattle University
- June Johnson Seattle University
eTextbook
- Anytime, anywhere learning with the Pearson+ app
- Easy-to-use search, navigation and notebook
- Simpler studying with flashcards
- Hardcover, paperback or looseleaf edition
- Affordable rental option for select titles
For courses in writing.
Practical, teachable, and grounded in current theory and research
Thinking Rhetorically is a guide to develop the writing, researching and editing skills needed in college and beyond. Informed by research, its emphasis is on reading and writing as rhetorical acts. Explanations, examples and engaging classroom activities evoke deep learning with the goal of helping students transfer compositional and rhetorical skills across disciplines and professions.
Newly reorganized around interdisciplinary metagenras (rather than aims), the 9th Edition has also been significantly revised to incorporate the authors' recent research and to respond to new scholarship and pedagogy.
Hallmark features of this title
- Develops the college-level writing skills required to pose a problem, summarize the world around the problem, and produce and support a thesis.
- Teaches rhetorical reading strategies to help students decipher difficult texts.
- Provides classroom-tested assignments that incorporate collaboration and peer review.
- Introduces rhetorical concepts of purpose and audience and covers multiple aims, genres (academic, civic and professional), and multimodal, personal and narrative forms.
- Uses reader-expectation theory (backed by cognitive research) to explain how closed-form prose achieves maximum clarity and open-form prose achieves its distinctive pleasures.
- Modular design and numbered concepts and skills let instructors and students work flexibly with the text.
New and updated features of this title
- NEW: The title, Thinking Rhetorically (formerly known as The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing), underscores the text's focus: teaching students to read mindfully, establish a purpose for writing, and meet reader expectations.
- NEW: With chapters and assignments organized around 4 metadisciplines, the text prepares students to transfer skills across disciplines. Informed by discipline-based research, students practice writing about various areas of study and strive to meet the reader expectations that align with those subject areas.
- NEW and UPDATED: Chapters/assignments are new or revised to align with the 4 metadisciplines. Reorganized coverage of argument includes a new research project; and revised analytical and expressive assignments illustrate how applying analytic thinking to the humanities can produce new knowledge.
- NEW: The new chapter on listening-to-learn via self-awareness, withholding judgements and reflective writing, encourages empathy, collaboration, and problem-solving.
- NEW: A new chapter on discovery research includes an empirical research report (using IMRD); and the problem-solving method is applied to a civics case.
- UPDATED: 2 revised chapters go deeper into the writing process, peer review approaches, and reflection.
PART 1: THE WRITER AS KNOWLEDGE-MAKER
- Posing Problems: The Demands of College Writing, Reading, and Critical Thinking
- Exploring Problems: Making Claims
PART 2: KNOWLEDGE-MAKING FROM A RHETORICAL PERSPECTIVE
- Rhetorical Choices and Why They Matter
- How Messages Persuade
- Principles of Argument
- Document Design, Visual Rhetoric, and Multimodal Messages
- Thinking Metacognitively about Undergraduate Research
PART 3: WRITING PROJECTS THAT PROMOTE TRANSFER
Foundational “Moves” for All Academic Thinking/Writing
- Summary, Rhetorical Analysis, and Strong Response
- Listening-to-Learn Reflection
- Analysis and Synthesis of Ideas
Thinking/Writing in the Interpretive Disciplines
- Analysis of a Short Story
- Analysis of a Photograph, Painting, or Advertisement
Thinking/Writing in the Empirical Inquiry Disciplines
- Empirical Research Report
Thinking/Writing in the Problem-Solving Disciplines (and Professional Careers)
- Argument as Inquiry: Exploratory Paper
- Argument as Persuasion: Classical Argument
- Evaluation Argument
- Proposal Argument
- Truth Issues: Problem-Solving Writing with an Informative Aim
Thinking/Writing in the Performance Disciplines
- Autobiographical Narratives as Literary Nonfiction
PART 4: A RHETORICAL GUIDE TO COMPOSING AND REVISING
- Writing as a Process of Drafting, Re-Seeing, and Revising
- Metacognitive Practice: Reflection, Self-Assessment, and Peer Review
- Strategies for Writing Closed-Form Prose
- Strategies for Writing Open-Form Prose
- Strategies for Composing Multimodal Texts
PART 5: A RHETORICAL GUIDE TO RESEARCH
- Asking Questions, Finding Sources
- Evaluating Sources and Taking Notes
- Incorporating Sources into Your Own Writing
- Citing and Documenting Sources and Writing an Annotated Bibliography
About our authors
John C. Bean is an emeritus professor of English at Seattle University, where he held the title of “Consulting Professor of Writing and Assessment.” He has an undergraduate degree from Stanford (1965) and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington (1972). He is the author of an internationally used book on writing across the curriculum--Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, 2nd edition (Jossey-Bass, 2011). He is also the co-author of The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing as well as two other influential composition textbooks–Writing Arguments and Reading Rhetorically. He has published numerous articles on writing and writing-across-the-curriculum as well as on literary subjects including Shakespeare and Spenser. His current research interests focus on pedagogical strategies for teaching undergraduate research including quantitative literacy, disciplinary methods of inquiry and argument, and the problem of “transfer of learning” as students move through and across a curriculum. A concomitant research interest is the development of institutional assessment strategies that promote productive faculty conversations about teaching and learning. In 2001, he presented a keynote address at the first annual conference of the European Association of Teachers of Academic Writing at the University of Groningen. He has delivered lectures and conducted workshops on writing-across-the-curriculum throughout the United States and Canada as well as for universities in Germany, Bangladesh, Ghana, and Zambia. In 2010 his article “Messy Problems and Lay Audiences: Teaching Critical Thinking within the Finance Curriculum” (co-authored with colleagues from finance and economics) won the 2009 McGraw-Hill — Magna Publications Award for the year's best “scholarly work on teaching and learning.”
June Johnson is an associate professor of English, Director of Writing Studies, and Writing Consultant to the University Core at Seattle University. She has a B.A. in English and an M.A. in Education from Stanford and an M.A. in English from Mills College. After chairing the English department of a preparatory school in Los Angeles and working as a development editor in educational publishing, she earned her Ph.D. from the University of Washington. At Seattle University, she supervises the teaching of first-year academic writing seminars as well as teaches these courses and advanced argument and composition theory in the Writing Studies minor. Her research areas include global studies, reflective writing, first-year composition, writing transfer, argumentation, and Rogerian communication–subjects on which she conducts workshops at Seattle University and at institutions around the country. She has published articles in American Studies on women's writing about the West in the nineteenth century. She is the co-author (with John Bean) of The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing, a text known for its foundation in writing-across-the-curriculum pedagogy and its useful introduction to academic writing and co-author (also with John Bean) of Writing Arguments, and she authored Global Issues, Local Arguments, 3rd Edition (Pearson, 2014), an argument reader and rhetoric with a civic literacy focus that provides a cross-curricular introduction to global problems.
Need help? Get in touch