How much responsible content should we have in our courses vs core Operations Management?
The need to promote responsible operations in academic teaching today has resulted in a significant transition for the webinar team, both in the shaping of the content across the different editions of their texbooks as well as their teaching of the discipline. Nigel Slack gave an overview of how the topic of sustainability in OM has changed the ways operations run over the recent years and, in consequence, how their viewpoint of sustainable and responsible operations has shifted, thereby influencing the layout and content they produce.
One of the key aspects of teaching responsible operations is the great interest students have in the subject and its context within operations. Having said that, according to Nicola Burgess, the link between studying responsible operations and the actual topic is equally important to establish this engagement, as there is a risk of being regarded as an add-on topic.
As a way to tackle this, the team has created “Responsibility Boxes” throughout the chapters, instead of a single chapter at the end of the book, weaving the subject through the content and, therefore, encouraging students to shape a similar viewpoint – which, to their experience, has proven to be very effective in terms of student engagement.
Acknowledging the controversy between academics – those who incorporate responsible operations into their teaching and those who avoid it because they feel it detracts them from the core OM issues and techniques – Nigel stresses how crucial the decisions they make are in structuring a course: