Can ChatGPT really revolutionise the way physics students solve problems?

View all tags

Can ChatGPT revolutionise the way physics students solve problems now, and how can educators navigate this shifting landscape?

If you are nterested in the impact technology is having in STEM teaching today, take part in survey and have your say.

Find the survey here

Can ChatGPT really revolutionise the way physics students solve problems?

ChatGPT is the artificial intelligence large language model (LLM) chatbot that is a buzzword right now in higher education for its ability to explain concepts and answer questions in a conversational manner.

Its ability to index large stores of data to generate a response enables it to be a great tool in solving even complex physics problems, making it a powerful aid for physicists and researchers.

While many are excited about the opportunities for higher education ChatGPT might provide, concern has arisen around the ethical dilemmas and hazards it may present to student development and true digital learning.

How can ChatGPT assist in higher education?

The main advantage that ChatGPT has to offer is its capacity as a language model to engage in conversational dialogue. Its ability to generate human-like text allows users to interact with it using natural, conversational language.

This conversational manner makes study much more human, where learning can take place with a computer much like it would with another person, through the use of questions and answers. So instead of searching key terms in a research repository or digital library and trawling  for the relevant information, students can ask questions about the subject they’re studying and be provided with clear conversational explanations quickly.

Does ChatGPT promote learning?

ChatGPT has the ability to solve simple physics problems, and ChatGPT4 has been developed multimodally to accept image input. This means it can assist students in analysing graphs and visual data. However, educators are concerned about ChatGPT’s potential to harm student development and critical thinking by solving all problems for them.

While ChatGPT may be a powerful tool for research, it is not necessarily an expert pedagogical tool. Educators need to ensure students understand the fundamental concepts and principles of physics before turning to ChatGPT. 

ChatGPT has the potential to negatively influence the way students answer questions by stopping them developing their critical thinking or understanding of the subject at all. If ChatGPT is simply providing them with solutions to problems, it will not help students solve them at all but will hinder critical thinking skills that are necessary for development.

Our new survey focusses on the impact technology is having in STEM teaching. Take part and give your input on the topic.

Find the survey here

The role of educators

Educators must play a key role in adopting technological options that can enhance the student learning experience while still encouraging students to develop an understanding of the principles of the subject. For example, such technologies can be used by educators to identify and target specific weak points in a student’s knowledge. They could also incorporate digital learning tools to develop more interactive and adaptive learning systems.

While AI technology has much to offer for the improvement of learning methods, it cannot revolutionise the way physics students solve problems alone. Rather, a more comprehensive approach is needed where educators take the lead in applying certain advantages education technology has to offer, and enhance the learning experience by utilising new teaching methods and learning techniques.

How do you respond to these changes in education, and in what ways can technology assist your teaching? Have your say.

Take part in our survey

 

In order to be in with a chance of winning £100 John Lewis prize draw vouchers (or retail equivalent) please make sure you provide your contact details. We respect your right to opt out and you can still actively participate anonymously in the survey if the prize draw is not of interest.

Filter by tag