How a course is implemented can affect learner performance and satisfaction.
As such, Pearson's learning design research team is keen to investigate the learning principles underpinning each implementation model: classroom, hybrid, and online.

As we all well know, there isn't a correct or incorrect answer. Rather, an institution's implementation concerns may be affirmed or negated by different models, as shown below:
Implementation concerns | Classroom | Hybrid | Online |
---|---|---|---|
Performance results | No | No | No |
Convenience | Yes | No | No |
Access to instructor | No | No | Yes |
Technology anxiety | No | Yes | Yes |
Learner anxiety | No | Yes | Yes |
Learner isolation | No | No | Yes |
Group management | No | No | Yes |
Attrition | - | - | No |
Rating | - | - | No |
The agreed method can be further enhanced by applying the following recommendations:
Implementation recommendations | Classroom | Hybrid | Online |
---|---|---|---|
Get familiar with resources | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Schedule interaction | Yes | ||
Create course orientation | Yes | Yes | |
Prove help process | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Use consistent processes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Set discussion expectations | Yes | ||
Alert students of reminders | Yes |
In summary, the 3 varieties for pedagogical implementation each have pluses and minuses which course design can assuage.