Curriculum and Assessment Review
Why 16-19 education is a critical piece of the curriculum and assessment review puzzle
When Professor Becky Francis presents her findings from the curriculum and assessment review next year, the media and commentators are likely to focus on their implications for school-aged children taking GCSEs and A levels.
Stability for 16–19 level 3 qualification pathways
We need stability for 16–19 level 3 vocational and technical pathways and to ensure that suitable diverse and progressive level 3 vocational provision continues to be available alongside T Levels and A levels.
Simplification and clarity for 16–19 level 2 and below vocational pathways
The level 2 vocational landscape needs to be simplified with an offer of two pathways – enabling progression to further study at level 3, or to employment or further work-based learning. The level 1 and below landscape also needs clarification and better provision to support employability and skills for independent living.