Alright. So which of the following modifications to the Milgram study showed decreased obedience rates? So remember, in general, what we saw is that modifications to the study design that essentially decreased the perceived authority of the experimenter often led to lower obedience rates. So looking at our first one, we have disagreement between experimenters, and that absolutely led to lower obedience rates. So if we had one experimenter saying, "please continue," and somebody else saying, "you can stop if you want," we would absolutely see lower obedience rates in that case.

Next, we have experimenters wearing lab coats, and wearing lab coats actually seems to increase obedience. It was when experimenters took off their lab coats that we would see decreased obedience. Next, we have performing the experiment in a generic office building versus on the Yale campus, and that did indeed decrease obedience rates, again kind of lowering the perceived authority of the experiment and the experimenter there. And then finally, we have separating the learner and the experimenter, and that is kind of irrelevant.

Because, really, what matters is if the participant, the teacher in this case, can see the learner or the confederate. It doesn't really matter if the experimenter can see them or not, so that is irrelevant to the question being asked here. Alright, so that is our example, and I will see you guys in the next one. Bye bye.