Now, I want to go into nucleophiles because remember that I said we have to define nucleophiles more than just saying negative is strong and neutral is weak. So I want to remind you guys of the difference between a nucleophile and a base because that actually is going to matter for this section. Okay? This section has a lot to do with conceptual questions that once again you could get in this chapter. What a nucleophile is, if you remember, had to do with the Lewis definition of acids and bases. So I'm just going to put here nucleophile is the Lewis definition. Wow, Johnny can't spell, Lewis. Okay? And what that means is that it's a good electron donor. Okay? So remember that basically if you can donate electrons easily, that's a good nucleophile. Okay? What's a good base? Well, a base is the Bronsted-Lowry definition. Okay? Remember what the Bronsted-Lowry definition is? That you're a good proton acceptor. Okay? Now, a lot of times, a good electron donor is also going to be a good proton acceptor. So a lot of times, these things are the same. Nucleophilicity and basicity have a lot of crossover. But there are going to be some instances where one of the things gets better and the other one doesn't, or even the other one gets worse. It might get better at donating electrons, but worse at pulling off a proton. And I'm going to show you how. So this is the way we determine the rules. The first rule is actually that generalization that I told you guys earlier, which is just that if you have a negative charge, that's always going to be a stronger nucleophile than neutral. So that's when I said basically strong versus weak. Okay? So you guys already knew the first rule just from me telling you that. But there's actually two more rules that you guys need to be aware of. Okay? So the second rule is that the bulkier the substrate, if you have a very bulky nucleophile, that's going to make it more basic and less nucleophilic. Okay? So what am I saying there? Okay? What I'm saying is that if you have a really bulky negatively charged compound, let's say. That means that it's going to be worse at donating electrons. Why? Because it's going to have a more difficult time approaching electrophiles because now it's going to be so bulky. So it's actually going to be worse at donating electrons. But it's actually going to be better at pulling off protons. Why? Because protons typically are at the edges of molecules. So it's easy for it to access a proton, but it's hard for it to donate electrons. Does that kind of make sense? This is going to come into play later when we talk about elimination reactions and bases that favor elimination. Because remember, elimination is about the base, not the nucleophile. It's about pulling off a proton. Alright? And then finally, this is our last rule that you need to know and then we'll be done with nucleophiles, which is that basicity and nucleophilicity almost always go in the same direction. So as you can see, as I go toward less electronegative, my bases, I mean, nucleophiles get stronger. Okay? And then also as I go up in the periodic table, my bases and my nucleophiles get stronger. That has to do with the size effect. Remember that? So basically, as you go up, you're going to be better at donating electrons because you're smaller, so you don't like them as much. Okay? That's kind of the point. And here I have a little drawing to show that. But it turns out that there is going to be an exception to the rule. And the exception Okay. I made it naked. Okay? I'm just going to put here they're naked. Okay? Pretty scandalous. There's nothing around them shielding them or whatever. Okay? But then, if you have a protic solvent, what did I say about protic solvents? Well, protic solvents, if you guys need to be reminded, are solvents that can hydrogen bond. If you can hydrogen bond, these are solvents that are typically attracted to charges, so they're attracted to positive charges and negative charges. So what they're going to do is they're going to do something called solvating. They're going to surround that negative charge. So here I've drawn a picture of water, which can hydrogen bond, it's protic, solvating fluoride and solvating iodine. Fluoride and iodine, okay? And what we find let me just move out of the way here for a second. Is that when you have a smaller anion like fluoride, the protic molecules are able to surround it better and able to more tightly solvate it. So what that means is that it's going to be a worse electron donor because it's so covered up. It's really solvated. That's the word for it. Solvated just means it's covered in all these water molecules. Okay? Whereas an iodide is so much bigger that it's going to be more loosely solvated. It's going to be more difficult for all the water to cover all the spots. It has a lot more surface area. So it's actually going to be a better electron donor even though it's a worse nucleophile. Okay? So it turns out that in a protic solvent, iodide is actually going to be your best nucleophile. Okay? So this trend is reversed as you can see in a protic solvent, this trend is reversed, but in an aprotic solvent, the trend is the way it was at the beginning, which is just that F is the best nucleophile and I is the worst. Okay? So this is going to be the one thing that you guys have to remember in terms of concept because you could see this kind of question all the time on all kinds of exams, all kinds of test banks where professors will ask what's the best nucleophile in a protic solvent? What's the worst nucleophile in an aprotic solvent? So you need to have these trends memorized like the back of your hand to answer those kinds of conceptual questions. Now, does it matter so much for mechanisms? Not usually. Usually, like I said, mechanisms aren't determined by the solvents necessarily, but you should still know it because it's going to give you a better understanding of the content of this chapter. Alright? So I hope that made sense. Let me know if I can explain it any better. Make sure to ask questions. This is something that typically a lot of students find is a little bit confusing. I hope that my little drawing here this is actually like a new drawing I just made for you guys. I hope that it will help you guys kind of relate to what I'm talking about a little bit better. Okay? So let's go ahead and move on to the next)section.
- 1. A Review of General Chemistry5h 5m
- Summary23m
- Intro to Organic Chemistry5m
- Atomic Structure16m
- Wave Function9m
- Molecular Orbitals17m
- Sigma and Pi Bonds9m
- Octet Rule12m
- Bonding Preferences12m
- Formal Charges6m
- Skeletal Structure14m
- Lewis Structure20m
- Condensed Structural Formula15m
- Degrees of Unsaturation15m
- Constitutional Isomers14m
- Resonance Structures46m
- Hybridization23m
- Molecular Geometry16m
- Electronegativity22m
- 2. Molecular Representations1h 14m
- 3. Acids and Bases2h 46m
- 4. Alkanes and Cycloalkanes4h 19m
- IUPAC Naming29m
- Alkyl Groups13m
- Naming Cycloalkanes10m
- Naming Bicyclic Compounds10m
- Naming Alkyl Halides7m
- Naming Alkenes3m
- Naming Alcohols8m
- Naming Amines15m
- Cis vs Trans21m
- Conformational Isomers13m
- Newman Projections14m
- Drawing Newman Projections16m
- Barrier To Rotation7m
- Ring Strain8m
- Axial vs Equatorial7m
- Cis vs Trans Conformations4m
- Equatorial Preference14m
- Chair Flip9m
- Calculating Energy Difference Between Chair Conformations17m
- A-Values17m
- Decalin7m
- 5. Chirality3h 39m
- Constitutional Isomers vs. Stereoisomers9m
- Chirality12m
- Test 1:Plane of Symmetry7m
- Test 2:Stereocenter Test17m
- R and S Configuration43m
- Enantiomers vs. Diastereomers13m
- Atropisomers9m
- Meso Compound12m
- Test 3:Disubstituted Cycloalkanes13m
- What is the Relationship Between Isomers?16m
- Fischer Projection10m
- R and S of Fischer Projections7m
- Optical Activity5m
- Enantiomeric Excess20m
- Calculations with Enantiomeric Percentages11m
- Non-Carbon Chiral Centers8m
- 6. Thermodynamics and Kinetics1h 22m
- 7. Substitution Reactions1h 48m
- 8. Elimination Reactions2h 30m
- 9. Alkenes and Alkynes2h 9m
- 10. Addition Reactions3h 18m
- Addition Reaction6m
- Markovnikov5m
- Hydrohalogenation6m
- Acid-Catalyzed Hydration17m
- Oxymercuration15m
- Hydroboration26m
- Hydrogenation6m
- Halogenation6m
- Halohydrin12m
- Carbene12m
- Epoxidation8m
- Epoxide Reactions9m
- Dihydroxylation8m
- Ozonolysis7m
- Ozonolysis Full Mechanism24m
- Oxidative Cleavage3m
- Alkyne Oxidative Cleavage6m
- Alkyne Hydrohalogenation3m
- Alkyne Halogenation2m
- Alkyne Hydration6m
- Alkyne Hydroboration2m
- 11. Radical Reactions1h 58m
- 12. Alcohols, Ethers, Epoxides and Thiols2h 42m
- Alcohol Nomenclature4m
- Naming Ethers6m
- Naming Epoxides18m
- Naming Thiols11m
- Alcohol Synthesis7m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Using HX11m
- Leaving Group Conversions - SOCl2 and PBr313m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Sulfonyl Chlorides7m
- Leaving Group Conversions Summary4m
- Williamson Ether Synthesis3m
- Making Ethers - Alkoxymercuration4m
- Making Ethers - Alcohol Condensation4m
- Making Ethers - Acid-Catalyzed Alkoxylation4m
- Making Ethers - Cumulative Practice10m
- Ether Cleavage8m
- Alcohol Protecting Groups3m
- t-Butyl Ether Protecting Groups5m
- Silyl Ether Protecting Groups10m
- Sharpless Epoxidation9m
- Thiol Reactions6m
- Sulfide Oxidation4m
- 13. Alcohols and Carbonyl Compounds2h 17m
- 14. Synthetic Techniques1h 26m
- 15. Analytical Techniques:IR, NMR, Mass Spect6h 50m
- Purpose of Analytical Techniques5m
- Infrared Spectroscopy16m
- Infrared Spectroscopy Table31m
- IR Spect:Drawing Spectra40m
- IR Spect:Extra Practice26m
- NMR Spectroscopy10m
- 1H NMR:Number of Signals26m
- 1H NMR:Q-Test26m
- 1H NMR:E/Z Diastereoisomerism8m
- H NMR Table21m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting (N + 1) Rule17m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Simple Tree Diagrams11m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Complex Tree Diagrams8m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Patterns8m
- NMR Integration18m
- NMR Practice14m
- Carbon NMR4m
- Structure Determination without Mass Spect47m
- Mass Spectrometry12m
- Mass Spect:Fragmentation28m
- Mass Spect:Isotopes27m
- 16. Conjugated Systems6h 13m
- Conjugation Chemistry13m
- Stability of Conjugated Intermediates4m
- Allylic Halogenation12m
- Reactions at the Allylic Position39m
- Conjugated Hydrohalogenation (1,2 vs 1,4 addition)26m
- Diels-Alder Reaction9m
- Diels-Alder Forming Bridged Products11m
- Diels-Alder Retrosynthesis8m
- Molecular Orbital Theory9m
- Drawing Atomic Orbitals6m
- Drawing Molecular Orbitals17m
- HOMO LUMO4m
- Orbital Diagram:3-atoms- Allylic Ions13m
- Orbital Diagram:4-atoms- 1,3-butadiene11m
- Orbital Diagram:5-atoms- Allylic Ions10m
- Orbital Diagram:6-atoms- 1,3,5-hexatriene13m
- Orbital Diagram:Excited States4m
- Pericyclic Reaction10m
- Thermal Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Photochemical Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Thermal Electrocyclic Reactions14m
- Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions10m
- Cumulative Electrocyclic Problems25m
- Sigmatropic Rearrangement17m
- Cope Rearrangement9m
- Claisen Rearrangement15m
- 17. Ultraviolet Spectroscopy51m
- 18. Aromaticity2h 31m
- 19. Reactions of Aromatics: EAS and Beyond5h 1m
- Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution9m
- Benzene Reactions11m
- EAS:Halogenation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Nitration Mechanism9m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Alkylation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Acylation Mechanism5m
- EAS:Any Carbocation Mechanism7m
- Electron Withdrawing Groups22m
- EAS:Ortho vs. Para Positions4m
- Acylation of Aniline9m
- Limitations of Friedel-Crafts Alkyation19m
- Advantages of Friedel-Crafts Acylation6m
- Blocking Groups - Sulfonic Acid12m
- EAS:Synergistic and Competitive Groups13m
- Side-Chain Halogenation6m
- Side-Chain Oxidation4m
- Reactions at Benzylic Positions31m
- Birch Reduction10m
- EAS:Sequence Groups4m
- EAS:Retrosynthesis29m
- Diazo Replacement Reactions6m
- Diazo Sequence Groups5m
- Diazo Retrosynthesis13m
- Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution28m
- Benzyne16m
- 20. Phenols55m
- 21. Aldehydes and Ketones: Nucleophilic Addition4h 56m
- Naming Aldehydes8m
- Naming Ketones7m
- Oxidizing and Reducing Agents9m
- Oxidation of Alcohols28m
- Ozonolysis7m
- DIBAL5m
- Alkyne Hydration9m
- Nucleophilic Addition8m
- Cyanohydrin11m
- Organometallics on Ketones19m
- Overview of Nucleophilic Addition of Solvents13m
- Hydrates6m
- Hemiacetal9m
- Acetal12m
- Acetal Protecting Group16m
- Thioacetal6m
- Imine vs Enamine15m
- Addition of Amine Derivatives5m
- Wolff Kishner Reduction7m
- Baeyer-Villiger Oxidation39m
- Acid Chloride to Ketone7m
- Nitrile to Ketone9m
- Wittig Reaction18m
- Ketone and Aldehyde Synthesis Reactions14m
- 22. Carboxylic Acid Derivatives: NAS2h 51m
- Carboxylic Acid Derivatives7m
- Naming Carboxylic Acids9m
- Diacid Nomenclature6m
- Naming Esters5m
- Naming Nitriles3m
- Acid Chloride Nomenclature5m
- Naming Anhydrides7m
- Naming Amides5m
- Nucleophilic Acyl Substitution18m
- Carboxylic Acid to Acid Chloride6m
- Fischer Esterification5m
- Acid-Catalyzed Ester Hydrolysis4m
- Saponification3m
- Transesterification5m
- Lactones, Lactams and Cyclization Reactions10m
- Carboxylation5m
- Decarboxylation Mechanism14m
- Review of Nitriles46m
- 23. The Chemistry of Thioesters, Phophate Ester and Phosphate Anhydrides1h 10m
- 24. Enolate Chemistry: Reactions at the Alpha-Carbon1h 53m
- Tautomerization9m
- Tautomers of Dicarbonyl Compounds6m
- Enolate4m
- Acid-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation4m
- Base-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation3m
- Haloform Reaction8m
- Hell-Volhard-Zelinski Reaction3m
- Overview of Alpha-Alkylations and Acylations5m
- Enolate Alkylation and Acylation12m
- Enamine Alkylation and Acylation16m
- Beta-Dicarbonyl Synthesis Pathway7m
- Acetoacetic Ester Synthesis13m
- Malonic Ester Synthesis15m
- 25. Condensation Chemistry2h 9m
- 26. Amines1h 43m
- 27. Heterocycles2h 0m
- Nomenclature of Heterocycles15m
- Acid-Base Properties of Nitrogen Heterocycles10m
- Reactions of Pyrrole, Furan, and Thiophene13m
- Directing Effects in Substituted Pyrroles, Furans, and Thiophenes16m
- Addition Reactions of Furan8m
- EAS Reactions of Pyridine17m
- SNAr Reactions of Pyridine18m
- Side-Chain Reactions of Substituted Pyridines20m
- 28. Carbohydrates5h 53m
- Monosaccharide20m
- Monosaccharides - D and L Isomerism9m
- Monosaccharides - Drawing Fischer Projections18m
- Monosaccharides - Common Structures6m
- Monosaccharides - Forming Cyclic Hemiacetals12m
- Monosaccharides - Cyclization18m
- Monosaccharides - Haworth Projections13m
- Mutarotation11m
- Epimerization9m
- Monosaccharides - Aldose-Ketose Rearrangement8m
- Monosaccharides - Alkylation10m
- Monosaccharides - Acylation7m
- Glycoside6m
- Monosaccharides - N-Glycosides18m
- Monosaccharides - Reduction (Alditols)12m
- Monosaccharides - Weak Oxidation (Aldonic Acid)7m
- Reducing Sugars23m
- Monosaccharides - Strong Oxidation (Aldaric Acid)11m
- Monosaccharides - Oxidative Cleavage27m
- Monosaccharides - Osazones10m
- Monosaccharides - Kiliani-Fischer23m
- Monosaccharides - Wohl Degradation12m
- Monosaccharides - Ruff Degradation12m
- Disaccharide30m
- Polysaccharide11m
- 29. Amino Acids3h 20m
- Proteins and Amino Acids19m
- L and D Amino Acids14m
- Polar Amino Acids14m
- Amino Acid Chart18m
- Acid-Base Properties of Amino Acids33m
- Isoelectric Point14m
- Amino Acid Synthesis: HVZ Method12m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Acetamidomalonic Ester Synthesis16m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: N-Phthalimidomalonic Ester Synthesis13m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Strecker Synthesis13m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Esterification7m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Acylation3m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Hydrogenolysis6m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Ninhydrin Test11m
- 30. Peptides and Proteins2h 42m
- Peptides12m
- Primary Protein Structure4m
- Secondary Protein Structure17m
- Tertiary Protein Structure11m
- Disulfide Bonds17m
- Quaternary Protein Structure10m
- Summary of Protein Structure7m
- Intro to Peptide Sequencing2m
- Peptide Sequencing: Partial Hydrolysis25m
- Peptide Sequencing: Partial Hydrolysis with Cyanogen Bromide7m
- Peptide Sequencing: Edman Degradation28m
- Merrifield Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis18m
- 32. Lipids 2h 50m
- 34. Nucleic Acids1h 32m
- 35. Transition Metals5h 33m
- Electron Configuration of Elements45m
- Coordination Complexes20m
- Ligands24m
- Electron Counting10m
- The 18 and 16 Electron Rule13m
- Cross-Coupling General Reactions40m
- Heck Reaction40m
- Stille Reaction13m
- Suzuki Reaction25m
- Sonogashira Coupling Reaction17m
- Fukuyama Coupling Reaction15m
- Kumada Coupling Reaction13m
- Negishi Coupling Reaction16m
- Buchwald-Hartwig Amination Reaction19m
- Eglinton Reaction17m
Nucleophiles and Basicity - Online Tutor, Practice Problems & Exam Prep
Nucleophiles are defined as good electron donors according to the Lewis definition, while bases are good proton acceptors per the Brønsted-Lowry definition. Key rules include that negatively charged nucleophiles are stronger than neutral ones, bulkier nucleophiles are less nucleophilic but more basic, and basicity and nucleophilicity generally align. In protic solvents, smaller anions like fluoride are more solvated, making them poorer nucleophiles compared to larger anions like iodide. Understanding these trends is crucial for conceptual questions in organic chemistry.
What's the difference between a nucleophile and a base? You may already know the answer from before. If not, let me try to refresh your memory. Think Bronsted-Lowry and Lewis. Ring a bell?
Understanding the difference between basicity and nucleophilicity.
Video transcript
Recall that a Nucleophile is an electron pair donor (Lewis Base), and a Base is a proton acceptor (Bronsted-Lowry Base).
While the terms nucleophile and base often mean the same thing, there are some exceptions where basicity and nucleophilicity do not mirror each other.
Relative Strength Rules:
- A negative charge will always be a stronger nucleophile than its neutral counterpart.
- The bulkier the base, the more basic and less nucleophilic it is.
- Basicity and nucleophilicity have opposite size trends in polar protic solvents.
Do you want more practice?
More setsHere’s what students ask on this topic:
What is the difference between a nucleophile and a base?
A nucleophile is defined by the Lewis definition as a good electron donor, meaning it can easily donate electrons to form a bond. A base, on the other hand, is defined by the Brønsted-Lowry definition as a good proton acceptor, meaning it can accept a proton (H+). While many nucleophiles are also good bases, the two properties are not always aligned. For example, a bulky nucleophile may be less effective at donating electrons but still be a strong base because it can easily access and pull off protons.
How does the bulkiness of a nucleophile affect its nucleophilicity and basicity?
The bulkiness of a nucleophile affects its nucleophilicity and basicity differently. A bulkier nucleophile is less nucleophilic because its large size makes it difficult to approach and donate electrons to an electrophile. However, it is more basic because its size allows it to easily access and pull off protons, which are typically located at the edges of molecules. This distinction is important in reactions like elimination, where the base's ability to remove a proton is crucial.
Why are smaller anions like fluoride less nucleophilic in protic solvents?
In protic solvents, smaller anions like fluoride (F-) are less nucleophilic because they are more heavily solvated. Protic solvents can hydrogen bond and surround the anion, effectively 'covering' it with solvent molecules. This solvation makes it harder for the anion to donate electrons, thus reducing its nucleophilicity. Larger anions like iodide (I-) are less solvated due to their size, making them better nucleophiles in protic solvents.
How do nucleophilicity and basicity trends change in protic vs. aprotic solvents?
In protic solvents, nucleophilicity decreases with decreasing anion size because smaller anions are more solvated. For example, iodide (I-) is a better nucleophile than fluoride (F-) in protic solvents. In aprotic solvents, the trend is reversed: nucleophilicity increases with decreasing anion size because there is no solvation effect. Thus, fluoride (F-) is a better nucleophile than iodide (I-) in aprotic solvents. Basicity trends generally follow nucleophilicity trends but are less affected by solvent type.
What are the key rules for determining nucleophilicity and basicity?
The key rules for determining nucleophilicity and basicity are: 1) Negatively charged nucleophiles are stronger than neutral ones. 2) Bulkier nucleophiles are less nucleophilic but more basic. 3) Basicity and nucleophilicity generally align, with both increasing as you move up the periodic table and toward less electronegative elements. Additionally, in protic solvents, smaller anions are more solvated and thus less nucleophilic, while in aprotic solvents, the trend is reversed.
Your Organic Chemistry tutors
- For each pair, predict the stronger nucleophile in the SN2 reaction (using an alcohol as the solvent). Expla...
- For each pair, predict the stronger nucleophile in the SN2 reaction (using an alcohol as the solvent). Expla...
- [FIGURE: KEY MECHANISM 7-1] Show what happens in step 2 of the example if the solvent acts as a nucleophile...
- a. Which is a stronger base: RO− or RS−? b. Which is a better nucleophile in an aqueous solution? c. Which i...
- Which is a better nucleophile? e. HO− or -NH2 in NH3 f. HO− or -NH2 in DMSO
- Which member of each pair is a better nucleophile in methanol? e. I− or Br− f. Cl− or Br−
- Rank the following species in each set from best nucleophile to poorest nucleophile. c. H2O and NH3 in methan...
- How does the ratio of substitution product to elimination product formed from the reaction of propyl bromide ...
- Which is a better nucleophile? c. CH3O− or CH3OH in CH3OH
- Which is a better nucleophile? d. CH3O− or CH3OH in DMSO
- Rank the following species in each set from best nucleophile to poorest nucleophile. a.
- Rank the following species in each set from best nucleophile to poorest nucleophile. b.
- Rank the reactivity of the following anions with a general electrophile from least to most reactive.
- Which nucleophile would be more reactive in the solvent given? (a) vs.
- Which nucleophile would be more reactive in the solvent given? (b) vs.
- For each pair, choose the more reactive nucleophile. (a) vs.
- (•) For each pair, choose the nucleophile that would react most quickly in an Sₙ2 reaction (assume H₂O is the...
- (•) For each pair, choose the nucleophile that would react most quickly in an Sₙ2 reaction (assume H₂O is the...
- (•) For each pair, choose the nucleophile that would react most quickly in an Sₙ2 reaction (assume H₂O is the...
- In contrast to the results of Assessment 13.18, when a secondary haloalkane is treated with sodium ethanethiol...
- Between pyrrole and pyrrolidine, which nitrogen would be most nucleophilic? Why? vs.
- The zwitterionic form of carbonyls is often used to explain their electrophilicity. Draw the zwitterionic stru...
- Would you expect the following bases to favor E1 or E2 elimination?(c) <IMAGE>
- For each pair, choose the more reactive nucleophile.(b) <IMAGE> vs. <IMAGE>
- Would you expect methoxide ion to be a better nucleophile if it is dissolved in CH3OH or if it is dissolved i...
- Indicate which species in each pair gives a higher substitution-product-to-elimination-product ratio when it r...
- For each pair, predict the stronger nucleophile in the SN2 reaction (using an alcohol as the solvent).Explain ...
- For each pair, predict the stronger nucleophile in the SN2 reaction (using an alcohol as the solvent).Explain ...
- SN1 substitution and E1 elimination frequently compete in the same reaction.Compare the function of the solven...
- Which nucleophile would be more reactive in the solvent given?(c) <IMAGE> vs. <IMAGE>