Now I want to dig deeper into one of the more important parts of elimination and that's the beta hydrogen. All right. So you guys might remember that elimination reactions essentially pull off beta hydrogens and then they form double bonds. If you think back to the definition of elimination, we recall that, let's say you have a single bond to a leaving group and a single bond to a hydrogen, what winds up happening is that these two sigma bonds get pulled off and turn into one pi bond. Alright? So that's the whole process of elimination. The actual definition is that two sigmas turn into one pi. Alright? So that's not bad. But the tricky part comes in with the beta hydrogens because it turns out that you will rarely have just one beta hydrogen that applies towards this rule. Often, you're going to have several beta hydrogens from which to choose. This complicates things more because if you select a different beta hydrogen to extract, that might actually yield a new product. So, this
- 1. A Review of General Chemistry5h 5m
- Summary23m
- Intro to Organic Chemistry5m
- Atomic Structure16m
- Wave Function9m
- Molecular Orbitals17m
- Sigma and Pi Bonds9m
- Octet Rule12m
- Bonding Preferences12m
- Formal Charges6m
- Skeletal Structure14m
- Lewis Structure20m
- Condensed Structural Formula15m
- Degrees of Unsaturation15m
- Constitutional Isomers14m
- Resonance Structures46m
- Hybridization23m
- Molecular Geometry16m
- Electronegativity22m
- 2. Molecular Representations1h 14m
- 3. Acids and Bases2h 46m
- 4. Alkanes and Cycloalkanes4h 19m
- IUPAC Naming29m
- Alkyl Groups13m
- Naming Cycloalkanes10m
- Naming Bicyclic Compounds10m
- Naming Alkyl Halides7m
- Naming Alkenes3m
- Naming Alcohols8m
- Naming Amines15m
- Cis vs Trans21m
- Conformational Isomers13m
- Newman Projections14m
- Drawing Newman Projections16m
- Barrier To Rotation7m
- Ring Strain8m
- Axial vs Equatorial7m
- Cis vs Trans Conformations4m
- Equatorial Preference14m
- Chair Flip9m
- Calculating Energy Difference Between Chair Conformations17m
- A-Values17m
- Decalin7m
- 5. Chirality3h 39m
- Constitutional Isomers vs. Stereoisomers9m
- Chirality12m
- Test 1:Plane of Symmetry7m
- Test 2:Stereocenter Test17m
- R and S Configuration43m
- Enantiomers vs. Diastereomers13m
- Atropisomers9m
- Meso Compound12m
- Test 3:Disubstituted Cycloalkanes13m
- What is the Relationship Between Isomers?16m
- Fischer Projection10m
- R and S of Fischer Projections7m
- Optical Activity5m
- Enantiomeric Excess20m
- Calculations with Enantiomeric Percentages11m
- Non-Carbon Chiral Centers8m
- 6. Thermodynamics and Kinetics1h 22m
- 7. Substitution Reactions1h 48m
- 8. Elimination Reactions2h 30m
- 9. Alkenes and Alkynes2h 9m
- 10. Addition Reactions3h 18m
- Addition Reaction6m
- Markovnikov5m
- Hydrohalogenation6m
- Acid-Catalyzed Hydration17m
- Oxymercuration15m
- Hydroboration26m
- Hydrogenation6m
- Halogenation6m
- Halohydrin12m
- Carbene12m
- Epoxidation8m
- Epoxide Reactions9m
- Dihydroxylation8m
- Ozonolysis7m
- Ozonolysis Full Mechanism24m
- Oxidative Cleavage3m
- Alkyne Oxidative Cleavage6m
- Alkyne Hydrohalogenation3m
- Alkyne Halogenation2m
- Alkyne Hydration6m
- Alkyne Hydroboration2m
- 11. Radical Reactions1h 58m
- 12. Alcohols, Ethers, Epoxides and Thiols2h 42m
- Alcohol Nomenclature4m
- Naming Ethers6m
- Naming Epoxides18m
- Naming Thiols11m
- Alcohol Synthesis7m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Using HX11m
- Leaving Group Conversions - SOCl2 and PBr313m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Sulfonyl Chlorides7m
- Leaving Group Conversions Summary4m
- Williamson Ether Synthesis3m
- Making Ethers - Alkoxymercuration4m
- Making Ethers - Alcohol Condensation4m
- Making Ethers - Acid-Catalyzed Alkoxylation4m
- Making Ethers - Cumulative Practice10m
- Ether Cleavage8m
- Alcohol Protecting Groups3m
- t-Butyl Ether Protecting Groups5m
- Silyl Ether Protecting Groups10m
- Sharpless Epoxidation9m
- Thiol Reactions6m
- Sulfide Oxidation4m
- 13. Alcohols and Carbonyl Compounds2h 17m
- 14. Synthetic Techniques1h 26m
- 15. Analytical Techniques:IR, NMR, Mass Spect7h 3m
- Purpose of Analytical Techniques5m
- Infrared Spectroscopy16m
- Infrared Spectroscopy Table31m
- IR Spect:Drawing Spectra40m
- IR Spect:Extra Practice26m
- NMR Spectroscopy10m
- 1H NMR:Number of Signals26m
- 1H NMR:Q-Test26m
- 1H NMR:E/Z Diastereoisomerism8m
- H NMR Table24m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting (N + 1) Rule22m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Simple Tree Diagrams11m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Complex Tree Diagrams12m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Patterns8m
- NMR Integration18m
- NMR Practice14m
- Carbon NMR4m
- Structure Determination without Mass Spect47m
- Mass Spectrometry12m
- Mass Spect:Fragmentation28m
- Mass Spect:Isotopes27m
- 16. Conjugated Systems6h 13m
- Conjugation Chemistry13m
- Stability of Conjugated Intermediates4m
- Allylic Halogenation12m
- Reactions at the Allylic Position39m
- Conjugated Hydrohalogenation (1,2 vs 1,4 addition)26m
- Diels-Alder Reaction9m
- Diels-Alder Forming Bridged Products11m
- Diels-Alder Retrosynthesis8m
- Molecular Orbital Theory9m
- Drawing Atomic Orbitals6m
- Drawing Molecular Orbitals17m
- HOMO LUMO4m
- Orbital Diagram:3-atoms- Allylic Ions13m
- Orbital Diagram:4-atoms- 1,3-butadiene11m
- Orbital Diagram:5-atoms- Allylic Ions10m
- Orbital Diagram:6-atoms- 1,3,5-hexatriene13m
- Orbital Diagram:Excited States4m
- Pericyclic Reaction10m
- Thermal Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Photochemical Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Thermal Electrocyclic Reactions14m
- Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions10m
- Cumulative Electrocyclic Problems25m
- Sigmatropic Rearrangement17m
- Cope Rearrangement9m
- Claisen Rearrangement15m
- 17. Ultraviolet Spectroscopy51m
- 18. Aromaticity2h 34m
- 19. Reactions of Aromatics: EAS and Beyond5h 1m
- Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution9m
- Benzene Reactions11m
- EAS:Halogenation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Nitration Mechanism9m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Alkylation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Acylation Mechanism5m
- EAS:Any Carbocation Mechanism7m
- Electron Withdrawing Groups22m
- EAS:Ortho vs. Para Positions4m
- Acylation of Aniline9m
- Limitations of Friedel-Crafts Alkyation19m
- Advantages of Friedel-Crafts Acylation6m
- Blocking Groups - Sulfonic Acid12m
- EAS:Synergistic and Competitive Groups13m
- Side-Chain Halogenation6m
- Side-Chain Oxidation4m
- Reactions at Benzylic Positions31m
- Birch Reduction10m
- EAS:Sequence Groups4m
- EAS:Retrosynthesis29m
- Diazo Replacement Reactions6m
- Diazo Sequence Groups5m
- Diazo Retrosynthesis13m
- Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution28m
- Benzyne16m
- 20. Phenols55m
- 21. Aldehydes and Ketones: Nucleophilic Addition4h 56m
- Naming Aldehydes8m
- Naming Ketones7m
- Oxidizing and Reducing Agents9m
- Oxidation of Alcohols28m
- Ozonolysis7m
- DIBAL5m
- Alkyne Hydration9m
- Nucleophilic Addition8m
- Cyanohydrin11m
- Organometallics on Ketones19m
- Overview of Nucleophilic Addition of Solvents13m
- Hydrates6m
- Hemiacetal9m
- Acetal12m
- Acetal Protecting Group16m
- Thioacetal6m
- Imine vs Enamine15m
- Addition of Amine Derivatives5m
- Wolff Kishner Reduction7m
- Baeyer-Villiger Oxidation39m
- Acid Chloride to Ketone7m
- Nitrile to Ketone9m
- Wittig Reaction18m
- Ketone and Aldehyde Synthesis Reactions14m
- 22. Carboxylic Acid Derivatives: NAS2h 51m
- Carboxylic Acid Derivatives7m
- Naming Carboxylic Acids9m
- Diacid Nomenclature6m
- Naming Esters5m
- Naming Nitriles3m
- Acid Chloride Nomenclature5m
- Naming Anhydrides7m
- Naming Amides5m
- Nucleophilic Acyl Substitution18m
- Carboxylic Acid to Acid Chloride6m
- Fischer Esterification5m
- Acid-Catalyzed Ester Hydrolysis4m
- Saponification3m
- Transesterification5m
- Lactones, Lactams and Cyclization Reactions10m
- Carboxylation5m
- Decarboxylation Mechanism14m
- Review of Nitriles46m
- 23. The Chemistry of Thioesters, Phophate Ester and Phosphate Anhydrides1h 10m
- 24. Enolate Chemistry: Reactions at the Alpha-Carbon1h 53m
- Tautomerization9m
- Tautomers of Dicarbonyl Compounds6m
- Enolate4m
- Acid-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation4m
- Base-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation3m
- Haloform Reaction8m
- Hell-Volhard-Zelinski Reaction3m
- Overview of Alpha-Alkylations and Acylations5m
- Enolate Alkylation and Acylation12m
- Enamine Alkylation and Acylation16m
- Beta-Dicarbonyl Synthesis Pathway7m
- Acetoacetic Ester Synthesis13m
- Malonic Ester Synthesis15m
- 25. Condensation Chemistry2h 9m
- 26. Amines1h 43m
- 27. Heterocycles2h 0m
- Nomenclature of Heterocycles15m
- Acid-Base Properties of Nitrogen Heterocycles10m
- Reactions of Pyrrole, Furan, and Thiophene13m
- Directing Effects in Substituted Pyrroles, Furans, and Thiophenes16m
- Addition Reactions of Furan8m
- EAS Reactions of Pyridine17m
- SNAr Reactions of Pyridine18m
- Side-Chain Reactions of Substituted Pyridines20m
- 28. Carbohydrates5h 53m
- Monosaccharide20m
- Monosaccharides - D and L Isomerism9m
- Monosaccharides - Drawing Fischer Projections18m
- Monosaccharides - Common Structures6m
- Monosaccharides - Forming Cyclic Hemiacetals12m
- Monosaccharides - Cyclization18m
- Monosaccharides - Haworth Projections13m
- Mutarotation11m
- Epimerization9m
- Monosaccharides - Aldose-Ketose Rearrangement8m
- Monosaccharides - Alkylation10m
- Monosaccharides - Acylation7m
- Glycoside6m
- Monosaccharides - N-Glycosides18m
- Monosaccharides - Reduction (Alditols)12m
- Monosaccharides - Weak Oxidation (Aldonic Acid)7m
- Reducing Sugars23m
- Monosaccharides - Strong Oxidation (Aldaric Acid)11m
- Monosaccharides - Oxidative Cleavage27m
- Monosaccharides - Osazones10m
- Monosaccharides - Kiliani-Fischer23m
- Monosaccharides - Wohl Degradation12m
- Monosaccharides - Ruff Degradation12m
- Disaccharide30m
- Polysaccharide11m
- 29. Amino Acids3h 20m
- Proteins and Amino Acids19m
- L and D Amino Acids14m
- Polar Amino Acids14m
- Amino Acid Chart18m
- Acid-Base Properties of Amino Acids33m
- Isoelectric Point14m
- Amino Acid Synthesis: HVZ Method12m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Acetamidomalonic Ester Synthesis16m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: N-Phthalimidomalonic Ester Synthesis13m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Strecker Synthesis13m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Esterification7m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Acylation3m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Hydrogenolysis6m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Ninhydrin Test11m
- 30. Peptides and Proteins2h 42m
- Peptides12m
- Primary Protein Structure4m
- Secondary Protein Structure17m
- Tertiary Protein Structure11m
- Disulfide Bonds17m
- Quaternary Protein Structure10m
- Summary of Protein Structure7m
- Intro to Peptide Sequencing2m
- Peptide Sequencing: Partial Hydrolysis25m
- Peptide Sequencing: Partial Hydrolysis with Cyanogen Bromide7m
- Peptide Sequencing: Edman Degradation28m
- Merrifield Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis18m
- 32. Lipids 2h 50m
- 34. Nucleic Acids1h 32m
- 35. Transition Metals5h 33m
- Electron Configuration of Elements45m
- Coordination Complexes20m
- Ligands24m
- Electron Counting10m
- The 18 and 16 Electron Rule13m
- Cross-Coupling General Reactions40m
- Heck Reaction40m
- Stille Reaction13m
- Suzuki Reaction25m
- Sonogashira Coupling Reaction17m
- Fukuyama Coupling Reaction15m
- Kumada Coupling Reaction13m
- Negishi Coupling Reaction16m
- Buchwald-Hartwig Amination Reaction19m
- Eglinton Reaction17m
Beta Hydrogen - Online Tutor, Practice Problems & Exam Prep
Elimination reactions involve the removal of beta hydrogens, transforming two sigma bonds into one pi bond. The presence of multiple beta hydrogens can lead to different products, depending on which hydrogen is removed. By identifying non-equivalent beta carbons with available hydrogens, one can predict the number of possible products, typically up to three. Understanding this concept is crucial for mastering elimination mechanisms and their outcomes in organic synthesis.
In order to predict E2 products, we’ll have to get good at recognizing how many different and eligible β-hydrogens exist.
Recognizing Different Beta-Carbons
Elimination reactions remove β-hydrogens to create double bonds.
- The number of non-equivalent β-carbons with at least one -H determines the number of possible products.
Unique β-carbons and possible products
Video transcript
For the following molecules, identify the number of unique products that could be obtained through elimination.
Identify the number of unique products
Video transcript
All right. So this is actually a really easy question. It can just be a little bit tricky the first time you're trying to figure it out. So how do we find out how many different products? What I would do first of all is indicate that the carbon that is attached directly to my iodine or my leaving group is my alpha. That means that every carbon coming off of that one is beta. Okay? Now, as you can see, I have three beta carbons. But do I have three different nonequivalent beta carbons? In order to figure that out, I have to see what they're attached to. So, I would say, okay, I have three beta carbons. Are they all attached to the same thing afterward? What you're going to notice is that all three of them are part of an ethyl group overall. So are these equivalent or non-equivalent? It turns out that they're all equivalent. They're all the same exact thing. Because it doesn't matter which proton I pull off, they're all exactly the same substituent. Now the next thing I have to do after figuring out if they're equivalent or not is see if they all have at least one hydrogen on them. And yes, actually, each of these has two. I've got two here, two here, two here. That doesn't matter. I don't care about one or two. I just care is there at least one. Yes, there is. So the answer is that I could use any of these beta carbons, but I'm only going to get one product because they're all equivalent. So the answer is I would just get one product. And I'm also going to go ahead and draw that. And what that one product would look like is just I could really pick any of the ones I want. I'm just going to go up with it. And that's going to be my one product. Because remember that basically what you do is you make a double bond between the alpha and the beta. And that's going to tell you what your end product looks like. You look at your alpha, you look at your beta, you draw a double bond between them, and that's that. Now you might be wondering, if I picked a different one, I picked the one that was at the bottom. It's the same exact thing. It doesn't matter because this is symmetrical. And then maybe you're like, does it matter if I drew the top thing this way? Same exact thing. It doesn't matter. These are all equivalent, so it doesn't matter how you draw it. Cool. So with that said, maybe it's a little bit easier now. Go ahead and try to predict how many products and draw the products of B. Remember that the way you draw the product is to draw a double bond between the alpha and the beta that you pick. So go for it.
Identify the number of unique products
Video transcript
All right. So let's start off with the alpha carbon. This is my alpha. So where are my betas? I've actually got 3 betas. 1, 2, 3. Okay? Do those 3 betas all have at least 1 hydrogen on them? Yes, they do. Okay? There's at least 1 hydrogen coming off of each one. So now I have to figure out are they all the same or are they different. Okay? And it turns out that 2 of these are exactly the same, these on the corners, because they're both secondary and they're both coming off the tips of those squares. Okay? But one of them is different than the others and that's this one because it's tertiary and it's between the two rings. Okay? So because of symmetry, even though I have 2, even though I have 3 carbons total that could participate, I only have 2 different types of carbons. I have the blue ones and I have the green one in the middle. Does that make sense? So that means that even though I could use any of these beta protons that I want, altogether I'm only going to get 2 different products. So let's go ahead and see what they would look like. So I'm going to put here 2 products. Okay. And what I would get is let's draw the blue one first. The blue one would just look like this. Oops. The blue one would look like this. I have my squares and now I went ahead and I draw a double bond between one of the alphas and one of the betas. Okay? It doesn't matter which one you pick because they're symmetrical. So you could have also drawn it on the left-hand side. Okay? What's the other product going to look like? Well, the other product would be the same general shape, but now I'm going to have a double bond in the middle. Okay? And that's because I and I wanted to draw that in green. Sorry. Not sure if it makes a big deal to you guys, but I just like showing that the green one would be the one that would create the green product and the blue one would create the blue product. Alright? Now, I know you guys might be already starting to think, Johnny, which one would I get more of or would I get the same? Don't worry about that yet. We're going to have rules that decide that later, but for right now, I just want you guys to get used to just drawing these products and knowing how many different ones you could get. All right? So let's move on to the next one.
Identify the number of unique products
Video transcript
Alright. So what number did you guys get? It should be 2. Okay. Let me show you why. Because this is my alpha, and then let's look at my betas. I actually have 3 betas. I have a beta here, a beta here, and a beta here. Okay? Now, I know that it might have been tricky to recognize that this top one was a beta, but it is. It's a methyl group coming directly off of the alpha, so that by definition is a beta. Alright? So now I've got my 3 betas. Do all of them have at least 1 proton? The answer is no, okay? This one has a proton, and this one has a proton, at least 1, but this bottom one doesn't. It only has R groups coming off of it. It only has carbons. So that means that this one cannot participate at all. That means now I'm stuck with just 2 options. Alright? So now what I have to say is okay, are those options equivalent or are they different from each other? What do you guys think? They're super different. One of them is on the ring, one of them is on a branch, completely different. So what that means is let's say if this is my red and this is my blue, I'm gonna get 2 different products. So let's write that, 2 products and let's draw these products. The red one would look like this. Remember it's between alpha and beta, so it would be a double bond between, oops, between alpha and beta, and then I would still get everything else the same here and here, but now I would actually draw the beta that's on the methyl. I would draw it on a stick. Why is that? Because it turns out that now, I'm not talking about the chlorine by the way, the chlorine left. Okay? But I'm talking about this methyl right here. It used to be on a dash and now I'm drawing it on a stick. Why? Because if you remember back to chapter 1, we talked about hybridization, this carbon right there is trigonal planar now. It has it's an sp2 hybridized, bond and or atom and that means that everything has to be on the same plane. So it's actually wrong to draw that methyl group on a dash because you it looks like you see that it's a double bond but that you don't remember that it's trigonal planar. Okay? And no one wants to look stupid, right? So that's why you're going to go ahead and apply the rule of it being trigonal planar. It's kind of like if you were drawing a triple bond and you draw it with a zigzag pattern. Everyone knows, duh, you have to draw a triple bond straight because it's linear. Same kind of deal. Alright. And yeah, who knows if you have a free response test, your professor could actually take off a point or 2 because you forgot that it has to be trigonal planar. Let's see the other product. The other product would be that I have the blue one which would have been that these groups are the same. But now I have a double bond going towards that methyl group, so I'd act
Identify the number of unique products
Video transcript
Last one, and I know you guys all got it right, the answer was 3 products. Okay. And why is that? Because I had 3 carbons that had at least 1 beta hydrogen and they were all different. Let me show you. So my alpha was right here in the middle. And then I had this beta. Okay? Well, are they different? Well, first of all, do they all have at least 1 H on them? Yes. Okay? Are they all different? Yes, they are because one is a methyl, one is an ethyl, and the blue one is, do you guys remember, isopropyl. So they're all completely different. That means that if I eliminate down 1 or the other, I'm going to get a different product. All right? So let's go ahead and draw out the 3 different products that I would get. Let's start off with the red one. The red one would look like this. I would get everything the same, but a double bond going up this way. Remember, between alpha and that beta carbon, the blue one would have a double bond this way. And then lastly, the green one, which I'm gonna take myself out of the picture so you guys can see it, or maybe I won't. There we go. Oh, gosh. What just happened? Okay. So we had a little technical difficulty. So I'm just gonna go ahead and draw it on top. What I would have is the same compound, but now with a double bond facing this way. Okay? So notice that I just drew it down because I was drawing between the alpha and between the green beta carbon. Alright? So hopefully this helps you guys, hopefully this really helps you guys understand the differences between locating different beta hydrogens. This is actually one of the things that people struggle with the most doing elimination reactions. And this is going to work for every single elimination reaction that we talk about whether it's E1 or E2. Okay? So let me know if you have any questions. But if not, let's move on to the next topic.
Do you want more practice?
More setsHere’s what students ask on this topic:
What is a beta hydrogen in organic chemistry?
A beta hydrogen in organic chemistry refers to a hydrogen atom that is attached to a beta carbon. The beta carbon is the carbon atom adjacent to the alpha carbon, which is directly bonded to a functional group or a leaving group. In elimination reactions, beta hydrogens are crucial because their removal leads to the formation of a double bond, transforming two sigma bonds into one pi bond. Understanding the role of beta hydrogens is essential for predicting the products of elimination reactions.
How do you identify beta hydrogens in a molecule?
To identify beta hydrogens in a molecule, first locate the alpha carbon, which is directly bonded to the functional group or leaving group. The carbons adjacent to the alpha carbon are the beta carbons. Any hydrogen atoms attached to these beta carbons are considered beta hydrogens. These beta hydrogens are the ones that can be removed during elimination reactions, leading to the formation of a double bond.
Why are beta hydrogens important in elimination reactions?
Beta hydrogens are important in elimination reactions because their removal is a key step in the formation of a double bond. During an elimination reaction, a base abstracts a beta hydrogen, and the electrons from the C-H bond form a pi bond between the alpha and beta carbons. This process transforms two sigma bonds into one pi bond, resulting in the formation of an alkene. The presence and position of beta hydrogens determine the possible products of the reaction.
How do multiple beta hydrogens affect the outcome of elimination reactions?
Multiple beta hydrogens can lead to the formation of different products in elimination reactions. Each beta hydrogen that can be removed represents a potential site for double bond formation. If a molecule has several non-equivalent beta carbons with available hydrogens, removing different beta hydrogens can produce different alkenes. This results in the possibility of multiple products, typically up to three, depending on the number of unique beta carbons with hydrogens.
What is the maximum number of products you can get from an elimination reaction involving beta hydrogens?
The maximum number of products you can get from an elimination reaction involving beta hydrogens is typically three. This is because a molecule can have up to three non-equivalent beta carbons, each with at least one hydrogen that can be removed. Each unique beta carbon with a hydrogen represents a potential site for double bond formation, leading to different possible alkenes as products.