In this example, we want to match the statements on the left with the type of thinking that they best represent on the right, and it says here some statements may match more than one type of thinking. Alright. So our types of thinking that we've talked about are ladder-based thinking, population thinking, tree-based thinking, and typological thinking. Alright. So let's go through these statements one by one.
A) Species are unchanging. Which way of thinking or ways of thinking do you think that applies to? Well, we said that ladder-based thinking often treats these unchanging species. So I'm going to put an A there. And also, we said typological thinking. Typological thinking, we said that species match an unchanging type, and that idea came from Plato. Alright. So that's A. Now we have B) Humans are the most complex organism.
Which type of thinking does that align with? Well, that's really that ladder-based thinking. Right? The ladder, or that great chain of being, the scala naturae, that puts organisms on a hierarchy from most simple to most complex, with humans being at the top. Alright.
Next, we have C) Species can change over time. Well, species can change over time. That aligns with both population thinking and tree-based thinking. Alright. Next, we have D) Common ancestry can explain similarities between organisms.
Which way of thinking does that represent? Alright. Really, that's at the heart of that tree-based thinking. We want to think of the relationships between organisms as their evolutionary relationships, finding their common ancestors. Alright.
That brings us to E) Species descriptions should include their variation. Well, that we said was at the heart of that population thinking. Thinking that when you're describing a species, you need to know all the variation that's out there, not describing that species by a single type. Alright. And then finally, we have variation as is seen as imperfection.
Alright. Variation is seen as imperfection. We say that that is most closely aligned with this typological thinking. Right? You have a perfect type, this ideal, and the variation that you see is some deviation from that type.
Alright. There are more videos to come. I'll see you there.