Hi. In this lesson, we'll be talking about the excretory system and osmoregulation. Osmoregulation is the homeostatic mechanism that allows organisms to balance their solute concentration and body, which is why the excretory system is heavily involved with osmoregulation. But the excretory system has another important job, and that's getting rid of nitrogenous waste, which we'll talk about in just a moment. Now, the excretory system is made up of a few components.
The main part is the kidney, that's like the business end of the excretory system. That's this bean-shaped organ; you actually have two, one on either side of your body, and it's going to filter blood plasma and form urine. But its job is so much more sophisticated than that; we'll really get into the details in just a moment. Now, the kidney is going to give off urine that will be transported to the bladder by the ureters. These are going to be tubes basically that lead from the kidneys to the bladder, which is the storage organ for urine.
And urine will be stored there until it is ready to be eliminated through the urethra, which is the opening to the environment. Now, here you can see an example of a fish trying to maintain its osmotic balance by drinking seawater, and passing water and solutes in and out of its body to excrete solutes so that it can maintain an osmotic balance in its body. Now, nitrogenous waste is bad because ammonia is a super toxic substance, and it's only safe in the animal body if it's heavily diluted. It's going to form from the breakdown of proteins and nucleic acids. Right?
They both have nitrogens in their structures, and those nitrogens are going to be given off as ammonia. This is, for some organisms, okay because they can just heavily dilute the ammonia and eliminate it that way. Here you can actually see what ammonia looks like. It's just a nitrogen with some hydrogens attached to it; and, you know organisms that have plenty of water around them, for example, like tadpoles, they'll often eliminate their nitrogenous waste as ammonia because water is very plentiful for them. So it's okay for them to waste a lot of water diluting the ammonia because there's plenty more available.
For organisms that have less water available, urea tends to be a better choice in terms of eliminating nitrogenous waste. Now it consumes energy to make urea. Those organisms have to take their ammonia and convert it into urea. As you can see, ammonia has one nitrogen, urea has two nitrogens, and a carbon and an oxygen. It's actually basically formed by combining ammonia and CO2.
That's a, you know, sort of oversimplified version of how urea is made. The difference is it's way less toxic than ammonia, and it doesn't need to be as heavily diluted. It can be excreted with minimal water loss, which is super important for, for example, terrestrial animals like us. We excrete urea because we don't have that endless supply of water, you know, like all around us like a tadpole for example. So we don't want to waste as much water getting rid of our nitrogenous waste.
Some organisms, like organisms that live in really dry climates, like reptiles in a desert for example, will actually go even further and choose to excrete their nitrogenous waste as uric acid. You can see the uric acid right here; jump out of the way so my head's not blocking it, and as you can see, ammonia had one nitrogen, urea had two nitrogens, and uric acid has four nitrogens. So it is a bigger molecule but it gets rid of more nitrogen. It costs more energy to produce than urea. It's more energy-intensive.
However, it's basically insoluble, so it can be excreted with almost no water loss, which is why it would be the appropriate choice for a desert-dwelling organism, like a lizard for example, where water is extremely scarce. Now, the basic point I'm trying to make is that the type of waste excreted by an organism is tied to things like its evolutionary history, and its habitat, and its level of osmotic stress. So, you know, for example, some birds excrete most of their nitrogenous waste as uric acid, but ducks, for example, excrete some, like almost half really is urea, and the rest is uric acid because, you know, they live in water, they're waterfowl, they have more water available to them. So it's not, you know, species necessarily species-specific. It really depends on a variety of factors, including habitat.
Now, the other point I'm trying to make is that there's a fitness trade-off between how much energy it costs to produce the particular molecule that will get rid of this nitrogenous waste, and conserving water. Right? You know, you might be able to save a lot of water by making uric acid, but it might cost you more energy than you can afford to produce it. So perhaps urea, for example, would be the better choice for you. You know, these are just the trade-offs of using either strategy.
Point is, nothing's perfect in biology. It's just about doing the best you can given your conditions. So with that, let's flip the page.